This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 2, 2019.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 11#Module:Rail
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Delete
Thryduulf (
talk)
18:06, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Target section was previously deleted because the character only appears twice (
[1]). Page should be deleted.
Namenamenamenamename (
talk)
23:46, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete
Thryduulf (
talk)
18:07, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Target section was previously deleted because the character only appears twice (
[2]). Page should be deleted.
Namenamenamenamename (
talk)
23:45, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 16#Daddy Longlegs (comics)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
00:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Character does not meet
WP:GNG. She appears 10 times according to Marvel Wikia. The information about this character on the target page was deleted for this reason (
[3]). There are no incoming links to this page in article space.
Namenamenamenamename (
talk)
23:34, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 16#Centurion (comics)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 16#Chaka (comics)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 16#Claw (Marvel Comics)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 13#Clear-Cut (comics)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 13#Isolationist (comics)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
21:20, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Redirects to broken anchor. Only link in article space is from a disambiguation page. Should probably be deleted.
Namenamenamenamename (
talk)
22:31, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 13#Godfrey Calthrop
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
20:52, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Redirects to broken anchor. Only incoming link in article space is a passing mention which provides enough context. Should be deleted.
Namenamenamenamename (
talk)
22:15, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
20:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Redirects to a broken anchor. No links in article space. Should be deleted.
Namenamenamenamename (
talk)
22:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Neil Crawford (Marvel Comics)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
19:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Redirect is to a broken anchor. Only link in article space is from a disambiguation page. Should be deleted.
Namenamenamenamename (
talk)
22:10, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Phillip Campbell (comics)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
19:50, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
No links in article space. Should be deleted.
Namenamenamenamename (
talk)
22:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
01:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
No links to this redirect in article space. Should be deleted.
Namenamenamenamename (
talk)
22:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. "Delete" not because of what the nominator said (because I would say "Keep" for that since incoming links have nothing to do with the usefulness of a redirect), but target because the redirect is not mentioned in the target article.
Steel1943 (
talk)
13:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
01:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
No links to this page, no notable page history
Namenamenamenamename (
talk)
21:56, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
01:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
No information about this character at the target, no links from articles to this page, page has apparently been deleted multiple times previously.
Namenamenamenamename (
talk)
21:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of marvel comics supervillains that are more than one superheroe's enemie
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
00:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Delete per
WP:RFOREIGN. Space Shuttles have no affinity with the Arabic language. --
Tavix (
talk)
19:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
01:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
I think the redirect should be deleted. A similar redirect,
Braces (clothing) already exists; it is not syntactically correct to omit a space between a word/phrase and a parenthetical; and
nothing redirects to this page. --
ElKabong888 (
talk)
13:10, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Dexter's Laboratory (Season 2, Episode 11)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
19:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
This is formatted very oddly and is not in line with the rest of the redirects for this series. I don't have a proper target for this to point to because most DL episodes contain three segments. Just delete it.
Paper Luigi
T •
C
12:39, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure)
B dash (
talk)
07:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
This redirect is unused and should not be supported.
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes#Consistency between infoboxes requires that the infobox be in the style of Template:Infobox some subject
. In addition, this infobox name is very ambiguous and does not seem clear at all that it is used for an infobox.
Gonnym (
talk)
12:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. This has been a blue link
since 2004, and it's always served the same purpose: an infobox related to planets. Why break old revisions? And given the ambiguous name, who's going to add {{
planet}} anew?
Nyttend (
talk)
18:35, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Comment I created the redirect when I moved the template to a more standard name way back in 2007. I have no objection to either deleting or keeping it. I don't think it's used. Thanks.
Mike Peel (
talk)
22:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per Nyttend. There is no benefit that will arise from deletion and breaking the old revisions is at least undesirable.
Thryduulf (
talk)
13:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. The concern stated in the nomination is about the name of the page itself, which does not apply to redirects in most cases. This is one of those cases. In addition, since this redirect is in a non-article namespace, the requirements for it to meet naming standards are not as strict.
Steel1943 (
talk)
17:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Big Fat Awesome House Party for fosters home for imaginary friends
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 13#Big Fat Awesome House Party for fosters home for imaginary friends
List of secondary Imaginary Friends at Foster's
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 13#List of secondary Imaginary Friends at Foster's
Cheese (Fictional Character)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Cheese (disambiguation). —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
01:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Too vague? Is there another fictional character named Cheese? I think this redirect is pointless.
Paper Luigi
T •
C
11:41, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
19:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Huh? I don't know where this redirect's name comes from, and I was once a big fan of the show.
Paper Luigi
T •
C
11:37, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Mac. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
01:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
This redirect seems too vague on its own to redirect to FHFIF. Surely there is more than one notable Mac in television/film/literary history.
Paper Luigi
T •
C
11:32, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bowling Paul the bowling pin (Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
01:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
I don't know if this is a real character from the show or not, but the redirect seems costly regardless. Maybe a better redirect could be put it its place?
Paper Luigi
T •
C
11:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure)
B dash (
talk)
07:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Unused redirect, not a possible variant name for the club.
Ben5218 (
talk)
06:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- al-ittihad is an Arabic word meaning "union". –
Uanfala (talk)
14:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- That's correct.. Al Ittihad means United or Union in Arabic, but our case here is a different one; sport clubs' names shouldn't be translated. For example,
Eintracht Frankfurt is a German football team, and the word Eintracht in their name would mean United in English. Should we change their name to something like Frankfurt United? Of course no, and the same works with Al Ittihad Alexandria. We shouldn't have something like Alexandria Union or Alexandria United on Wikipedia just because that's the translation for their name.
Ben5218 (
talk)
16:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Yes, tranlsations such as these aren't suitable for article titles, but they could be plausible search terms, and that's what matters here (along with potential conflicts with other articles: there's one with
Alexandria Union Station, which is in a different part of the world). In this case, I don't think the use of "union" is particularly far fetched, especially given that the article lists variants like "Union club" and the like in the discussion of the history of the club. –
Uanfala (talk)
19:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
-
Ben5218, you might also want to add
Alexandrian Union to the nomination. –
Uanfala (talk)
14:35, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Keep'. I can see how this is a feasible search term.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
11:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
Giant
Snowman
13:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 12#Byah
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
01:04, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Redirects from randomly created days are
WP:COSTLY
B dash (
talk)
02:37, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.