This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 12, 2018.
Saif Nabel(Signer)
Ythsie
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 22#Ythsie
Windsole
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
20:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
This small feature isn't mentioned on the generically broad target, it is not even a settlement according to OS, just a feature, it
doesn't show up in the suggestions but it
does exist never the less and there is a
Commons cat.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
20:20, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Yes, it appears that there is one near
Auchterarder as well, but we don't have any mention either of them.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
20:53, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Which means disambiguation isn't suitable.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
18:07, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Practicable
Virtual Skipper 5: 32nd America's Cup: The Game
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was restore previous content.
Killiondude (
talk)
06:23, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
Only information about this topic is a minor entry in a very long list, no reader would have any gain from this redirect.
Lordtobi (
✉)
18:58, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Anne Blondel-Jouin
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 March 20#Anne Blondel-Jouin
Jacques Villeneuve's Racing Vision
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was What Tavix said. Not certain the article needs to exist, but
BLARing it to Ubisoft isn't helpful. If it's to be deleted, let AfD have it. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
10:27, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not in target article.
Lordtobi (
✉)
18:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Littleport Ice Stadium
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Great Britain Bandy Federation.
The Blade of the Northern Lights (
話して下さい)
23:25, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
Target article does not mention subject. It did once but it was removed.
Spinning
Spark
11:26, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Page needs a section on facilities. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
15:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC).
reply
- That may be so, but the Ice Stadium was removed on the grounds that it does not exist and there are no submitted plans to build it. If you think the editor that did that is wrong, then fine, reinsert the material. Otherwise there is no point to the redirect.
Spinning
Spark
17:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep or retarget. The project does exist as a proposal or idea, and seems to have got a bit of press attention, so I don't see why it isn't worth a single sentence in the Littleport article. But if there's a consensus that it doesn't belong there, then retarget to
Fen skating#Bundy, which includes a sentence that mentions the project (though until I edited it just now it didn't mention it by name). –
Arms & Hearts (
talk)
21:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Keep flora/fauna, delete rest. No consensus to retarget ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
10:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
Delete all per
WP:XY. In addition to the
WP:XY issue, these redirects could be considered confusing as they represent a group of subtopics that redirect to their parent topic; to compare, a redirect like
Spain and Greece doesn't exist to target
Europe or
Country, and
Atlanta and Madrid doesn't target
City.
Steel1943 (
talk)
18:28, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Comment On the
Flora page lead paragraph, it says that flora, fauna and fungi are collectively referred to as
biota which redirects to
Life.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
19:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep the last two (
Fauna and flora and
Flora and fauna) due to incoming links, though I am not adverse to a retarget if there is a better article. --
Tavix (
talk)
22:40, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- I looked at a few of those incoming links; a good number of them either hint that either there is a missing article (
WP:REDLINK), or that the two words
Flora and
Fauna should be linked separately, most being the latter.
Steel1943 (
talk)
22:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- That's out of my topic area, but I would expect these two to redirect to the same target as
Biota (ecology). –
Uanfala (talk)
17:15, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The current target of
Biota (ecology) is
Biome, and that doesn't seems like an appropriate target for the redirects since the subject of
Biome is to life/flora/fauna like
Continent is to
Country or
City.
Steel1943 (
talk)
19:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Flora and fauna is a widely used term so that should be kept. The other combinations, not so much.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
16:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Rhives
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
20:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
This place isn't mentioned on this generic target, it appears to be in the civil parish of
Kilmuir Easter but there is no article there and Scottish CPs appear to have limited recognition. Note that there
2 other features with this name, presumably non notable.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
17:49, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Rhireavach
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
20:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
This place doesn't even show up on Gegraph search but Google returns
Ruigh' riabhach, the current target is far too broad anyway. This is part of a number of possible problematic redirects, see
User:Sjorford/PrimroseGuy redirects.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
17:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Rhyd-lydan
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
20:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
There are 2 features in Wales called "
Rhyd-lydan", 1 in
Carmarthenshire and 1 in
Powys, there are also 2 settlements called "
Rhydlydan", 1
in
Conwy and the other in
Powys, there is also another feature called "Rhydlydan" in
Ceredigion
[2]. As there is no articles on either, with the different names, this is a
WP:X or Y redirect.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
15:51, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- A set index is possible, but if every entry is a redlink it does beg the question of whether the set index itself should exist. Unlike a redirect page, a set index is an article and needs to meet
WP:GNG, in its own way. In this case, there are two non-redlink targets available but neither of them actually mention the name.
Lithopsian (
talk)
17:38, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- If the only notable items are the 2 Rhydlydans then it doesn't make sense to have a set index, hatnotes will do anyway.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
10:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ystrad-ffyn
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
20:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
This appears to be an alternative name for
Ystradffin
[3] which is in the community of
Llanfair-ar-y-bryn but as there is no article at
Ystradffin or redirect to Llanfair-ar-y-bryn, this one should probably be deleted as its possible that it might not even be for this place.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
15:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Assuming that "Ystrad-ffyn" is an alternative name for Ystradffin, considering how obscure even Ystradffin is, it may not be.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
18:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Trash metal
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
The Blade of the Northern Lights (
話して下さい)
17:09, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
Vandals abuse this typo redirect to make low-key vandal edits to bands or recordings they deem to be terrible or "trash". The term doesn't show up int he target article. This is not helpful to Wikipedia. A "did you mean" when discovering the page doesn't exist suffices.
dannymusiceditor
Speak up!
14:49, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete- as far as I can tell right now it's meant to be a redirect from a typo. But, I am sure there are bands that call their music 'trash metal,' because genres are arbitrary and people call themselves whatever they want and fans follow. In any case, I think having nothing is better than having a redirect to an article which is unrelated. This typo may have an actual meaning, so having a redirect is unhelpful imo.
‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia
ᐐT₳LKᐬ
15:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Richard o'hammond
Armee d l´Air de l´Armistice
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
The Blade of the Northern Lights (
話して下さい)
17:11, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
Implausible typo, even in French. Correct spelling is
Armée de l'air de l'Armistice.
Place Clichy (
talk)
10:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- @
Ivanvector: That's what happened, put short, from
this page history:
- Hence the misleading R from move, the wrong targets, and the horribly spelled redirect not worth keeping imho.
Place Clichy (
talk)
17:02, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Aha! Thanks for that. These probably fall under
WP:G8 then, as pages that should have been deleted when their original target was soft-deleted. No harm in having a discussion, though.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Stupid Missile Crisis
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:37, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
Seems to be inspired by a
Chris Hayes tweet or a
Daily Kos article that appeared around the same time and coincides with the creation of this redirect. I don't really think that is enough to establish notability/standing.
Classicwiki (
talk) If you reply here, please
ping me.
04:31, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Former Baekje
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:38, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
The redirect is ambiguous because the target is/was never a former version of itself. If it is formerly anything, it is formerly part of current-day Korea.
Steel1943 (
talk)
23:42, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Third degree murder
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was procedural closure, as
third-degree murder is now an article (thanks 59.149.124.29!). I'll retarget both of the other redirects there, noting that other !votes were "keep all", not keep all but 3rd degree Murder. --
Tavix (
talk)
16:14, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
Though these redirects are mentioned in the target article, the use of the term "3rd" or "third" in regards to it use to define its "degree" is not well described in the target article. I found that the use of "3rd degree" is described/identified well in
Murder (United States law)#Degrees, but I am unsure if the use of "3rd degree" in regards to "murder" is exclusive to the United States.
Steel1943 (
talk)
21:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep all. I don't see a significant problem with the current target, which briefly describes the concept and provides a link to a deeper discussion of the concept in the U.S. context. The description in the current target could be more substantial, but it exists, so there's no reason not to send the reader to it. I note that the current target also mentions that third-degree murder exists in Peruvian law, so retargeting to the U.S.-specific article would not be a good solution. –
Arms & Hearts (
talk)
20:46, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Comment The relevant section of Peru's Criminal Code
[4] no longer even defines a crime known as "murder" (asesinato); since 2014 it is known as "homicidio calificado". And "homicidio" is divided only by types (e.g. parricide, infanticide, merciful homicide), not by numbered degrees as in U.S. law.
59.149.124.29 (
talk)
07:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
*Delete Third degree murder, Keep 3rd and Third-degree - The former isn't recognised as the official one I don't think and searching it here gives us both "Third degree murder" and "Third-degree murder", the latter ones are plausible search terms. –
Davey2010
Talk
14:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep all as per
Animalparty - In terms of linking the non-hyphenation one helps .... and the other 2 for plausible search terms. –
Davey2010
Talk
00:01, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep all, per Arms & Hearts' rationale. And a minor difference in hyphenation does absolutely no harm, and can aid in linking.
--Animalparty! (
talk)
23:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Comment I made
third-degree murder into its own article. As far as I can tell, nominator is correct: "third-degree murder" is US-only legal terminology, and in fact is rare even within the US. Only three states currently have a crime called "third-degree murder", and their definitions clash (e.g. Minnesota defines third-degree murder as
felony murder, whereas Pennsylvania put felony murder into second-degree murder and defined third-degree as anything not first or second degree). So this ends up being kind of a verbose
WP:CONCEPTDAB rather than a "real article" ...
- Anyway I'd suggest retargeting
third degree murder to
third-degree murder as a reasonable variation, but deleting
3rd Degree Murder per
WP:DIFFCAPS. Someone who explicitly types title-case into a Wikilink or the URL bar is trying to find a proper noun, not a generic noun; redirecting title case lemmas to normal case lemmas just promotes mislinking.
59.149.124.29 (
talk)
11:03, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Murked
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
The Blade of the Northern Lights (
話して下さい)
17:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
The connection between the redirect and the target is not clear, nor is the redirect mentioned in the target article.
Steel1943 (
talk)
20:13, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Murk (disambiguation) which explains the term, although that might have to be removed for the
MOS:DABMENTION purposes.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
01:38, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- I think a soft redirect to Wiktionary is the best solution here. It's a plausible enough search term, so there's no benefit to deletion. The current target is no good as it doesn't mention the term. And the disambiguation page is insufficient both because it fails
WP:DABMENTION and because there is another meaning of "murk" as a verb listed at
Wiktionary that isn't listed at the dab (and shouldn't be). As a somewhat obscure term that is not mentioned in Wikipedia but is defined at Wiktionary, a soft redirect is the best solution. –
Arms & Hearts (
talk)
20:54, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. None of the entries on the dab page
Murk are relevant. I don't think redirecting to wiktionary is a good idea: soft redirects are only used for terms that readers search for (see the criteria listed in
the documentation), and this redirect receives less than one view per week, which in my opinion is below the threshold. –
Uanfala (talk)
20:58, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Special circumstances (criminal law)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. With nobody knowing what to do with the redirect and a general agreement that the current target isn't appropriate, that leaves deletion. --
Tavix (
talk)
16:06, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
Though this is present in
Special circumstances, it is not mentioned in its target article. (This redirect currently fails
MOS:DABMENTION on the aforementioned disambiguation page.)
Steel1943 (
talk)
19:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Well, I found a good explanation of the differences between special circumstances and aggravating circumstances. Palmer, Louis J. (1998). "Distinguishing Special Circumstances and Statutory Aggravators". The Death Penalty: An American Citizen's Guide to Understanding Federal and State Laws. McFarland.
ISBN
9780786404445. ; Still dunno what to do with the redirect, since I guess that means a retarget to
aggravation (law) isn't appropriate.
59.149.124.29 (
talk)
15:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
El Siete
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Siete.
The Blade of the Northern Lights (
話して下さい)
23:26, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not in target
PRehse (
talk)
17:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Weak keep. Per the subject's website, its tag line is "El Siete". That, and the redirect doesn't fail
WP:FORRED as the redirect's target is a television station that broadcasts in Spanish. (But yes, per nom, if this redirect is kept, it should be mentioned in the target article.)
Steel1943 (
talk)
18:57, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Comment should
Siete be a disambiguation?
Siete can refer to the Spanish word to seven,
Siete (singer),
El Siete, Siete album by
Presuntos Implicados,
Siete (album) by Carlos Varela. There's also a
Sietes,
LaSiete, and it can house a link to PTM's.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
01:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
-
Siete is now a dab.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
02:23, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Since another band
El Sie7e has surfaced, but neither is really primary topic, I'd recommend the dab.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
19:16, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep, I've lazily added it to the target.
El Sie7e isn't an exact match, but a hatnote could be useful. --
Tavix (
talk)
16:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Siete. --
BDD (
talk)
20:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to the dab: useful target, and the clearest, nonbranding use. Plenty of other topics. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
10:22, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Weapons of war
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Military technology. --
Tavix (
talk)
15:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
The term "weapons of war" is so broad that it could apply to anything from spears, to swords, to aircraft, to ICBMS. It makes no sense at all to redirect this title to an article that is solely about handheld firearms. Instead of deletion, perhaps the redirect could be retargeted to
weapon or
military technology. Either would be way better than the current target.
Peacock (
talk)
13:36, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Name A Yellow Fruit
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk)
15:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
A highly implausible redirect, to say the least... I know it's a Family Feud reference, but this is hardly the place for in. In fact, I think I might WP:DAFT this, if indeed it actually gets removed.
Thegreatluigi (
talk)
01:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Comment are there some news sources that would support this as with the
In the butt, Bob phrase
[5]?
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
02:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete There are some bare mentions in Google News
[6]
[7]
[8], but it looks far too trivial to be worth a mention at
Family Feud (which doesn't list any other famous silly answers either). Also FWIW,
In the butt, Bob had far better sources than that, and it was still was removed from
The Newlywed Game by editors of that article, apparently due to
WP:WEIGHT issues.
59.149.124.29 (
talk)
07:36, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Relocate It's a reference to
Family Feud and I get the idea, but without context, the redirect makes no sense. I believe this should redirect to Family Feud.
DatGuyonYouTube (
talk)
14:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- There isn't an article or list for game show gaffes / blunders, but if there were, that's where it would go.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
19:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Town Convent
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Killiondude (
talk)
05:35, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
The redirect apparently exists because this church was once the town convent in Singapore. But Singapore is clearly not the only city that has had a town convent.
Oiyarbepsy (
talk)
02:54, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Watered