This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 14, 2018.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 24#Double Gate
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Slaughterhouse Rulez.
(non-admin closure)
feminist (
talk)
16:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Deletion suggested. This is a recent (triple?) redirect - see
Slaughter House Rules and
Slaughter house rules - and makes no sense whatsoever. Nothing within the target article suggests any reason for the redirect. Googling "Slaughterhouse rules" and "Slaughter House Rules" offers no clues. A new article has now been created, a film (presently a preview) named
Slaughterhouse Rulez which is how I arrived at the redirect, dropping down in the 'search' field. Confusing and unnecessary for these redirects to exist, IMO. -
Semperito (
talk)
19:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Slaughterhouse Rulez. @
Semperito: If we're going to discuss one, we should probably discuss all three. Would you object to me adding the other two redirects to this RfD? —
PinkAmpers
&
(Je vous invite à me parler)
20:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- That's good, thank you,
PinkAmpersand. I am inexperienced in this so it is a learning process for me.-
Semperito (
talk)
20:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Okay. I've added them. My !vote for them is the same as for the first one: retarget. —
PinkAmpers
&
(Je vous invite à me parler)
20:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- A look at
their contributions for 13 January alone shows 26 new redirects, with many nonsense minor variations on song lyric-lines, spelling, capitalization and punctuation.--
Semperito (
talk)
16:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Enemies in the Metroid Prime series
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was draftify. It will be found at
Draft:Abhilash Pudukad if anybody cares to work on it. --
Tavix (
talk)
15:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not in target - unclear piggy backing
PRehse (
talk)
12:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- It may be worth reading the talk page. In the last hour or two there has been discussion about making some sort of mention in the target. -
Sitush (
talk)
12:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
- This was created as a rather spammy article about a person who, judging from the comments on the talk page, might be just past the notability threshold, so I'm not sure if RfD is the best place to make a decision on that. The most "proper" course of action seems to be restoring the article, then trimming the puffery and taking it to AfD. Anyone's got the time for that? A move to the draft namespace (without leaving a redirect) would be an easier alternative. –
Uanfala (talk)
21:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Draftify per Uanfala. Anyone who wants to work on it can work on in draft space there, and if that doesn't happen in a reasonable amount of time it gets deleted as stale without further drama. More likely to produce a useful outcome than restoring in mainspace and sending to AFD – which will likely result in either a bunch of people voting for
WP:TNT regardless of the merits, or not wanting to deal with it at all (a la
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Characters of Final Fantasy V).
59.149.124.29 (
talk)
06:34, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was soft redirect to
September.
(non-admin closure)
Galobtter (
pingó mió)
11:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Redirect from user page to unconnected Article
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk)
09:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Soften. Fryedk specifically wants their user page to redirect to September, and since users have wide latitude to decide what should be on their userpage, I see no reason to deny them that ability. However, a hard redirect is somewhat problematic, because anyone else wanting to view their userpage would not want to automatically be taken to
September. Converting it to a
soft redirect solves that problem while allowing Fryedk to use their userpage how they wish. --
Tavix (
talk)
16:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Procedural question. Are we sure that this belongs here, rather than at MfD? Does this forum have the "constitutional" power to order someone to change their userpage? —
PinkAmpers
&
(Je vous invite à me parler)
20:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Soft redirect per
Tavix. This is traditionally the outcome on RfD for redirects from the "User:" namespace to the "(article)" namespace.
Steel1943 (
talk)
03:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Soft redirect per Tavix. As for the "constitutional" question, I wouldn't object if I saw this at MFD, but RfD is the "proper" place to discuss redirects regardless of namespace, with redirects in the template and project namespaces being particularly common. –
Uanfala (talk)
22:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk)
02:55, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned at
Marte. Fails
WP:FORRED: no connection to any of the languages listed
here.
LaundryPizza03 (
talk)
08:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Perhaps a misspelling of Spanish martes (Tuesday)? Days of the week are named after Roman gods and corresponding celestial objects in Romance languages (Moon day, Mars day, Mercury day, etc), except Christians partially renamed Saturday and Sunday. If it is a misspelling, it's not likely useful to an English reader.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
14:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- I don't think it is a misspelling, Marte does mean Mars in Italian, Spanish and Portuguese. Although I'm not too sure what use this redirect could have in the English wikipedia, since non-English speakers wouldn't be looking for info on the planet here. So delete.
RetiredDuke (
talk)
15:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per Ivanvector.
Double sharp (
talk)
06:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 25#Déjà vous
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk)
02:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in target. This is "
Jordan Harold" spelled backward.
LaundryPizza03 (
talk)
07:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk)
23:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
A weird misspelling.
LaundryPizza03 (
talk)
07:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk)
23:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Malformed disambiguation, so can’t redirect to
Dick (slang).
LaundryPizza03 (
talk)
06:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep all except for
Trypthophan. --
Tavix (
talk)
14:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Some, if not all, of these are implausible. Definitely the third to last.
LaundryPizza03 (
talk)
06:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk)
23:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Nothing to disambiguate from.
LaundryPizza03 (
talk)
06:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 24#30-verti
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 25#Mario Kart 3D