This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 23, 2018.
Far-wing terrorism in the United Kingdom
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk)
21:16, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
reply
Useless redirects as all of these film and TV show projects have titles now
74.89.40.77 (
talk)
22:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, mushroom, mushroom
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 2#Badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, mushroom, mushroom
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
01:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
reply
Well, I mean, it's technically accurate, but since anything at all to the power of 0 equals 1, I'm not sure why this one specific redirect is necessary. Also, no views at all in the last 30 days.
Thegreatluigi (
talk)
20:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
*Withdrawn by nominator. I still think this redirect is useless and should be deleted, but I can see I'm clearly in the minority, so I'll (somewhat grudgingly) withdraw this...
Thegreatluigi (
talk)
18:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as overly specific. I mean, any number to the 0th power is 1.
Steel1943 (
talk)
20:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
Keep. Mathematically, it might be silly to have such a redirect, but 10 is the base of the most common number system, and we have articles (or article sections) for many of its powers. I'm inclined to keep the redirect for consistency with
10^1,
10^2,
10^3,
10^4
10^5,
10^6,
10^7,
10^8,
10^9,
10^12,
10^15,
10^18,
10^21, etc. –
Uanfala (talk)
21:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per Uanfala.
Jjjjjjdddddd (
talk)
02:25, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Redirect to
Power of 10 as at least there it is described in a table. But
Orders of magnitude (numbers) is okay too. Alternatively
Exponentiation#Zero_exponent, but that would be more for redirects like
Zeroth power
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
03:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- I think it is similar to the page
1 E0, which used E-notation. --
ㅂㄱㅇ (
talk)
07:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as a commonly-enough used
synonym for the target because of
scientific notation. I disagree that
power of ten is a better target because the only relevant part is
1 itself. --
Tavix (
talk)
15:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per Uanfala. I was going to say the same thing.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
13:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. If
10^1,
10^2, etc. are not targeted to
Power of 10, it would be inconsistent to make an exception here.
Politrukki (
talk)
13:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk)
21:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
reply
Recently created cross namespace redirect - maybe an example of thousands proposed like it? This is a very unlikely reach string. It is a very unlikely and inappropriate base for a text link. We don't need to clutter up mainspace search with such redirects.
Legacypac (
talk)
17:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
In event of moon disaster
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 1#In event of moon disaster
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete per
WP:SNOW and
WP:G2. --
Tavix (
talk)
14:43, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
In Feb 2018 a user created this and redirected it at his own userpage. It shows up in all the Portal space navigation. Clearly no one is watching portal space very closely for this to get by. There is nothing Random about landing on this user's page from a portal page.
Legacypac (
talk)
14:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete looks like a test page, was created as an empty portal.
Peter James (
talk)
15:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Move to
User:Mac Henni/Portal:Random, inform the owner, and delete the nominated redirect. I'm not sure what the purpose of this page is/was, but to me, it almost looks like some sort of sandbox. Best let the page creator figure out what to do with it.
Steel1943 (
talk)
15:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- delete, test page created by a user who has hardly edited outside of user space. —
Kusma (
t·
c)
19:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per above.
Jjjjjjdddddd (
talk)
02:27, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as a test page.
Anarchyte (
work |
talk)
05:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Note that Mac Henni also created
Portal:Random/box-header.
Plantdrew (
talk)
19:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete
Portal:Random and G8
Portal:Random/box-header.
wumbolo
^^^
19:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Clearly a misuse of the portal name and purpose, serving no benefit to users. More like click-bait, than anything else.
Nick Moyes (
talk)
07:40, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 2#Template:Really
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Close in favor of
CfD. There are a lot of pages to go through here, but not much discussion anywhere. For this page's part, I don't think there's enough participation by uninvolved editors to consider this consensus, but I don't want to relist this because, as AngusWOOF points out, this isn't really the proper venue. Talkpage of the page in question would be best, but more to the point, a
CfD discussion was opened a day prior to this nomination. There isn't exactly much input there either, but given it was made first and that this stems from a
previous CfD, I'm closing this in favor of CfD as the (more) proper venue. ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
17:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
reply
I am trying to create an article for this redirect but there seem to be previous (somewhat) inconclusive discussions regarding the redirect (
User talk:Fayenatic london#CFD results: Opera Software). Discussions on individual talkpages went unanswered (
User talk:Onel5969#Otello Corporation,
User talk:Gotitbro#Rollback at Otello Corporation,
User talk:Winged Blades of Godric#Otello Corporation), listing for discussion here formally. Both corporations (Opera Software and Otello Corp.) are distinct entities and cannot be encompassed in one article as that leads to
WP:COAT as I had detailed in my edits
(1). Requesting for removal of redirect and article creation for Otello.
Gotitbro (
talk)
05:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ministers of the Ghanaian Government
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. Will tag with the relevant rcats.
Anarchyte (
work |
talk)
12:19, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
WP:SURPRISE. I followed the link expecting to be taken to a page giving information about the offices of the Ghanaian executive branch, and about how they are appointed etc., but I was instead taken to a page listing everyone who was appointed by the incumbent President. Delete. —
Mr. Guye (
talk) (
contribs)
04:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Final Fantasy/Final Fantasy Tactics
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. {{
R from subpage}} ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c)
01:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
reply
Implausible redirect, not properly formatted, should be deleted as unnecessary.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
03:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- What kind of a search would this redirect be "clutter" for? --
Tavix (
talk)
18:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- On wikipedia search box.
Legacypac (
talk)
18:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- No, specifically. Typing "Final Fantasy" gives the games and not this redirect, for example. --
Tavix (
talk)
18:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. The formatting and repetitive nature of this redirect could be considered a
WP:XY issue. I understand
Tavix's comment, but for those somewhat familiar with the Final Fantasy franchise/series (such as myself), this redirect could be considered somewhat misleading. To further explain, the Final Fantasy series takes place in multiple universes, though the universes intersect in the fighting game I cannot recall the name of at this time. However,
Final Fantasy Tactics apparently takes place in the same universe as
Final Fantasy XII. Anyways, before I go on too much of a lore/
WP:NOTWIKIA tangent, the point is that the redirect could potentially make a reader believe that the target is part of an aspect/universe of the
Final Fantasy series which it is not.
Steel1943 (
talk)
18:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep, 15 year old harmless legacy subpage redirect. —
Kusma (
t·
c)
20:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as implausible redirect. No reason to keep it out of historic curiosity.
‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia
ᐐT₳LKᐬ
03:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as legacy redirect from the days when mainspace subpages were standard.
Deryck
C.
16:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix (
talk)
21:12, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
reply
Deletion: This redirect was originally created as a hoax article for a nonexistent, fanmade SpongeBob spinoff series. It was redirected to the series page, but there is no reason for this redirect to exist since its topic is fake.
SBSPfan (
talk)
23:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.