This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 17, 2017.
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Powderfinger discography/TestInfobox
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. It's a neat relic from its days as a testinfobox, but consensus is that it's no longer useful. --
Tavix(
talk)18:39, 25 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Main Article: Casualties of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Josef Fritzl
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was refine to the section
Fritzl case#Josef Fritzl. There's a slight majority of editors here favoring redirection to the section, but there's also a couple other editors at the talk page wishing it refined to the section as well. Keeping all that in mind, I feel there's consensus for change. What is clear, however, is that protection is no longer necessary, so that will be removed. (Should that change for whatever reason, please check out
WP:RFPP or make the change yourself if you're an uninvolved admin. You do not need to seek my permission.) --
Tavix(
talk)18:35, 25 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Oppose Most people searching for this name will do so because of the case. No one is interested in him outside those crimes. So the redirect to the main article makes more sense than a redirect to the section of the main article. Regards SoWhy12:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment - I came here from a request at RFPP to remove protection, which I declined because the protecting admin had not been contacted and because this discussion is open.
NawlinWiki is not very active, but their entry in the protection log reads "no reason to edit or move this redirect without discussion" (emphasis added), thus I presume that they're okay with whatever the result is here. Also note that the creator of the redirect was notified, but he died a year ago.
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits)
14:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Remove all protection. When this redirect was vandalised by an IP when the topic was in the news more than nine years ago, some form of protection made sense. But definitely not full protection and definitely not for such an extended period. –
Uanfala (talk)22:28, 5 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Neutral, to make it formal. I don't think it really matters whether this redirect points to the bio section or to the top, it's the same article either way. As for protection, I see no need to keep the redirect at full protection, I only declined as a procedural matter as I explained above.
Ivanvector (Talk/Edits)
15:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Taurus (catamaran)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
No coverage of the subject is at the target page. Redirect was created "to prevent redlink from disambig page", in the process both causing confusion (see "no coverage of the subject at the target page") and against
WP:REDYES - this is a very-likely-notable subject, and a "phantom redirect" discourages creation of an actual article.
The BushrangerOne ping only10:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Nobody following the redirect is going to be any the wiser as the string "taurus" does not even appear in the target of the redirect. I even wondered if this was a hoax, as there is nothing to prove that it isn't. Googling shows that there is a manufacturer of modern catamarans called "Taurus", but that is not what is being claimed here, and not a whole lot else, but I did eventually find proof that it is not a hoax. There a reference to an individual catamaran (not a type) called "Taurus"
here, where it gets one paragraph and a few diagrams, which confirms the approximate time period claimed. Ironically, having this redirect only clogs up Google with unhelpful search results meaning that anybody who ever does want to know about this boat will have a harder job finding it. --
DanielRigal (
talk)
14:36, 17 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not mentioned in article, so it shouldn't even get a dab mention at Taurus. Appears to be a company, but there's verbiage saying it's a type from 1790?
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
02:29, 19 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
What language do they speak in Persia?
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete. Seems very unlikely to ever be searched as the country is no longer even called Persia and wouldn't be very helpful as it doesn't even redirect where you would expect, i.e.
Languages of Iran. Instead it is unhelpfully targeted at a non-existent section of
Iran. This is not helping anybody. --
DanielRigal (
talk)
14:51, 17 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Retarget There is no reason to delete this. It is harmless, not new, (see
WP:RFD:HARMFUL and is useful - in the seven years it has been there it will have provided a useful link about 3000 times. Remember that because the name of the country has changed, and the name of the language has changed twice, this is a particularly tricky piece of information to surface. All the best: RichFarmbrough,
12:59, 19 December 2017 (UTC).reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.