Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 8

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 8, 2016.

Wikipedia:CN/Unblocking of Daniel Brandt

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 03:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

This redirect has no incoming links, and Wikipedia:CN is a disambiguation page. Since the aforementioned page is a disambiguation page, though unlikely, a reader could think that this could relate to any page listed on the disambiguation page, even thinking this could refer to something such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon Network/Unblocking of Daniel Brandt. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jayce Salloum

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 16:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Jayce Salloum is a different person, so either there should be an article about him, or there should not, but it shouldn't redirect to Jackie Salloum. It's not a credible misspelling. Slashme ( talk) 22:25, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Huldra, you accidentally created that page in article space. I've moved it to User:Corie.waugh/Jayce Salloum and updated your link above. — Gorthian ( talk) 17:56, 11 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

GROHL, DAVID ERIC

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 16:09, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Delete as an implausible search term. I can't imagine anyone searching using his full name, IN CAPS, and searching with the surname first. -- Tavix ( talk) 20:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Texas Tech University Center in Quedlinburg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 14:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The only mention of these centers at the target article is that they exist. So we can safely say any reader searching for these terms already knows at least as much as he or she could learn from the page. -- BDD ( talk) 20:41, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nom. If the branch is notable this can be created as a redlink and mentioned in the school's navbox. Otherwise it's treated like a branch office (e.g. We've got centers in (list of cities).) AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 14:47, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Iron Horse Literary Review

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 14:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned at target article. Whether it's notable or not, this should be red for now. BDD ( talk) 20:39, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete It's a literary journal from Texas Tech. [2] [3] so it would fit under their English department, but since there is no separate article on Texas Tech's English department or a section for this journal, this doesn't need a link. If the founder Jill Patterson had an article, this could also be a redirect candidate. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 14:54, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Evangelical Lutheran Church in Namibia (GELK)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 14:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The church it redirects to is a different church, as that article points out. Indeed, the article links back to this redirect. Either someone should create this article, or the redirect ought to be deleted. Newbiepedian ( talk · contribs · X! · logs) 18:24, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Interesting. The linked article does in fact mention the GELK church and gives information about it (namely, that it's German-speaking), so in that sense the redirect does its job. On the other hand, there's at least a tiny risk of confusion owing to the possibility that the redirect will make someone think the two churches are the same. Whatever happened to the "redirects from antonyms" problem; was that ever resolved? This isn't an antonym, but the issues seem somewhat related. -- Trovatore ( talk) 20:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Derelict (2010 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete. The 2010 film article was deleted at AfD back in 2012, and this redirect to the unrelated 1930 film appears to have been created in error. PC78 ( talk) 17:45, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rikurzhen/randi (References)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

I assume these are authors on a work about race and intelligence, but neither are mentioned at all at the target article. BDD ( talk) 17:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

J. Philippe Rushton (References)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Absurdly misleading. You'd expect this to go to J. Philippe Rushton#References, if anything. Since we don't make such redirects, I recommend deletion. BDD ( talk) 17:28, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Between-Group Differences in IQ

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Noting the discretionary sanctions arising from Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence, I'm defaulting to delete on the basis that there's consensus the current target is not appropriate. Deryck C. 14:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC) reply

I've noted the target article as one with many redirects that need attention. For now, I'm just nominating some of the most egregious. This one is meaningless without context. Many different groups could have their IQ compared. It's an unlikely search term, and not one we could really serve. Note that Between-group differences in IQ was PRODed back in 2010. Since this really should've redirected there, and thus been speedily deleted G8, this is arguably a G6 case today. BDD ( talk) 17:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Grave Peril (film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete. This film article was redirected but looking at the sources and external links that were used, as well as some of the comments in the edit history, it appears that this was nothing more than a hoax. That being so this redirect serves no purpose. PC78 ( talk) 16:34, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Bold (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 14:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Target page is not a disambiguation page. Steel1943 ( talk) 14:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Also, Wikipedia:Bold was formerly a disambiguation page (which is why the nominated redirect exists), but at some point, a primary topic was determined somehow for this term (pointing towards Wikipedia:Be bold), and a hatnote pointing to MOS:BOLD (a redirect that directs readers to information about bold font) was added to the top of Wikipedia:Be bold. In my opinion, for the term "bold" without any variants (bolded, bolding, etc.) definitely refers to the subject in Wikipedia:Be bold, avoiding a WP:SURPRISE. ( When Wikipedia:Bold was a disambiguation page, it only included 2 entries: Wikipedia:Be bold and the target of MOS:BOLD. Wikipedia:Bold's most recent edit [redirecting to Wikipedia:Be bold] happened in December 2007.) Steel1943 ( talk) 23:17, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Thank you, Steel1943, all this comes as a reminder for me to look in a bit more detail at the target pages before asking any hasty questions. Uanfala ( talk) 08:49, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:BOAR

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 03:13, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

It doesn't look like these shortcuts were ever used, and doesn't look like they ever will be in regards to their current target. Unless there is a good retargeting option for these shortcuts can be thought of, it's probably best to delete them so they have the potential to be utilized for something else later. Steel1943 ( talk) 12:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Disambiguation:Bagger

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC) reply

These pseudo-namespace redirects are not useful, and we need to obtain consensus before creating similar redirects for other dab pages. 24.205.8.104 ( talk) 03:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete all: Four were the result of long-ago page moves to correct titles, and SNV was created as an unnecessary duplicate dab page and redirected to the existing one. None of them useful. Pam D 09:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_July_8&oldid=1088109561"

Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE