This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 7, 2015.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 April 16#X-rayish
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Pomology. --
BDD (
talk)
17:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
Currently targeted to
Apple#Apple production. Dictionary.com defines "Pomiculture" as "the growing or cultivation of fruit". Apples are not the only type of fruit.
Mr. Guye (
talk)
23:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
17:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
There is no need for this redirect to exist; there was nothing so outstanding about the 2010/11 season for the England u17s and there are no other redirects dedicated to a particular season for any other youth international football team.
HarrisonS4433 (
talk)
22:47, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 April 16#Maliciously
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
17:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
Delete. This French commune has nothing to do with Arabic.
Gorobay (
talk)
21:21, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was withdrawn (
non-admin closure)
Tavix |
Talk
03:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
Intended target is
Kyle DiFulvio (who has also gone under the name Kyle Justin, hence his confusion with the composer for AVGN) but
WP:RTYPO applies, especially since this could theoretically be the name of someone else entirely. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist
(Speak quickly)
(Follow my trail)
19:41, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Withdrawn It's buried on his page but apparently this is another alias he's used in his entertainment career. Lord only knows why it's not in the "Also known as" field of his infobox, but I will put it there now. My apologies. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist
(Speak quickly)
(Follow my trail)
21:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
17:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
A more accurate redirect, that already exists by the way, is "Angry Nintendo Nerd". The word "angry" is important as part of the character's title and serves as a disambiguator. "Nintendo nerd" is too vague. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist
(Speak quickly)
(Follow my trail)
19:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Apollo Moon landing hoax accusers
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
18:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
delete: This was deleted as an article (see
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollo Moon landing hoax accusers) and then I presume merged into the main hoax article. But that section no longer exists, presumably because it had the same issues that brought on the original deletion. I see no reason for the redirect if the information isn't going to be there at the atarget.
Mangoe (
talk)
17:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. --
BDD (
talk)
17:52, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
I believe this redirect qualifies for deletion under
WP:RFD#DELETE #8, "implausible typos or misnomers". "Baby i'm a firework" is not actually a lyric from the Katy Perry song
Firework (song). This redirect is a misspelled lyric from the song that happens to bring up Google search results. WP is, however, not Google. Redirects aren't intended to cover every possible search term.
Fisheriesmgmt (
talk)
03:24, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy delete, implausible redirect.
SarekOfVulcan (talk)
14:01, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
Implausible redirect (enclosed in quotes). -
Mr
X
01:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
17:21, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
There is no need for such specific redirects from userspace to main articlespace. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist
(Speak quickly)
(Follow my trail)
00:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was procedural close, given that the redirect has been converted to an article. Any concerns with the new page's existence will need to be bought up via a
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion nomination. (
non-admin closure)
Steel1943 (
talk)
19:53, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
As the ample number of related links on the target page shows, there are many kinds of puzzle cubes, not just one. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist
(Speak quickly)
(Follow my trail)
00:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Convert to set index to all articles containing puzzle box topics, including the historical topic of lock boxes with secret compartments needing special actions to open (whatever article that covers that). --
65.94.43.89 (
talk)
04:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
17:12, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
This was not the only game to feature a yellow dinosaur. (And not even in a playable capacity, no less.) Zeke, the Mad Horrorist
(Speak quickly)
(Follow my trail)
00:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.