May 16
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 16, 2014.
Set hMickfarland
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
16:29, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
Delete – This is a preposterous typo. No one would type "Set hMickfarland" into Wikipedia's search bar looking for
Seth MacFarlane except by total accident. –
Pee
Jay
21:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Μοναχός
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 May 23#Μοναχός
Προσωδία
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
16:29, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
Delete. Not especially Greek.
Gorobay (
talk)
20:22, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Μομεντο Μορι
Ταυτολογία
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
16:27, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
Delete. Not especially Greek.
Gorobay (
talk)
20:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
Delete per Gorobay. It is Greek of course, but I know Gorobay's meaning: it's not particular to Greece. The fact the word has been adopted into English would tend to indicate that it is not needed in the Greek alphabet. Hinders Greek language users who try to search for their own article: which appears not to exist (according to the Interwiki links). There's a bit of muck here because the Interwiki links are on the target (which is a DAB) whereas e.g. the Magyar (Hungarian) article refers specifically to a logical tautology (gives
truth tables and so on) and perhaps we need to move some of the Interwiki links somewhere, too.
Si Trew (
talk)
21:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Πολίτευμα
Παροιμία
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
16:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
Delete. Not especially Greek.
Gorobay (
talk)
20:08, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
Delete. Name of target is not at all Greek but Latin (proverbium).
Proverb#Paremiology is a section at the target, with an etymology from the Greek, and
Paremiography has its own article: still, the Greek alphabet redirects are unnecessary as usual. Stats for all three are at noise level (less than 1 hit a day on average for April).
Si Trew (
talk)
21:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Barns
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget. --
BDD (
talk)
16:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
Retarget to
Barn, which is the primary topic of the term. Most of the items on the disambiguation page can not even be referred to in the plural.
bd2412
T 18:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Μίτρα
Κληρικός
Αποστασία
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
16:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
Delete or retarget to
Apostasia of 1965. Apostasy itself is not especially Greek, but the Apostasia of 1965 certainly is. I don’t know if the event is ever simply called apostasía in Greek (as opposed to the full apostasía tou 1965) though.
Gorobay (
talk)
14:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Like Gorobay, I couldn't find anything that calls it just "apostasías". Are there other, um, apostasías? Perhaps actually my hesitation with the plural there is an indication of its inappropriateness: I don't know whether I would pluralize it in the Greek way or in the English way – so it is patently not English and therefore does not belong in the English Wikipedia (loanwords tend to take on English pluralizaion forms after they have been naturalised, so we would have
apostasia and the natural English plural
apostasias and probably erroneously but likely
apostasiae. There are a few like
Naïvety that some users retain the diacritical marks on, or
récherché, but then that second is a
false friend anyway.)
Si Trew (
talk)
22:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Savage Garden Album2
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
16:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
Bears little connection to the target such that it could be easily confused with
Affirmation, Savage Garden's second album, or just left people confused, since it's not specific enough, hence, delete.
Jinkinson
talk to me
04:18, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
Delete. Not mentioned at target, nor any variation "Album 2", "album 2" etc. The lede starts "The Savage Garden is the second studio album by the rock music band".... and I am quite aware of the affinity between the
cardinal number 2 and the
ordinal number "second", but I shouldn't have to teach the band
Peano's axioms. The article is entirely {{
unreferenced}}
not even wossit the music equivalent of an ISBN. So that is dodgy in itself as far as
WP:RS goes. . Not notable. Self-published with a
recording session? Not mentioned in article, not relevant, it should go. Is it
WP:PROMO?; an extensive external search leads me back to here but not to any record publisher etc.
Si Trew (
talk)
12:32, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
- Delete with extreme prejudice. The target Jinkinson mentioned should also go by the same reasoning. I did some searching around but this is, I think (I could be very wrong and am happy to be disproved), essentially self-published and comes under
WP:N and
WP:BAND and
WP:RS and
WP:V. Neither of the articles is referenced; one has none, the second has one which refers to the first. I can't find any record label that publishes this, hence my opinion it is self-published and so perhaps just
WP:PROMO.
Si Trew (
talk)
12:47, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.