This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 10, 2014.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
15:14, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
Nobody is ever going to search on or link to this.
Mogism (
talk)
22:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
15:14, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
This is an in-game concept (technically, a spell cast by a specific enemy in this game) that is not mentioned in the target article. So, delete per
WP:NOTWIKIA.
Steel1943 (
talk)
22:11, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Plowback retained earnings
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. --
BDD (
talk)
15:10, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
This recently created redirect is an implausible search term—given its length—that consists of two legitimate names of the target put together for no apparent purpose and should be deleted. It has no history worth preserving,
no incoming links, and even if someone were to type "plowback retained earnings" into the search box after the redirect is deleted, what they were looking for would come up at the very top of the list. The redirect fails to satisfy any of the
reasons for creating and maintaining redirects (an editing guideline) and it also violates
WP:POVNAME (a policy) which states that "[a]rticle titles and redirects should anticipate what readers will type as a first guess" and the first guess in this case would clearly be either
Plowback, or
Retained earnings, both of which already exist.
The above may not be immediately clear if you're unfamiliar with the term retained earnings, so allow me to put forth the following analogous examples of hypothetical redirects:
Fridge refrigerator,
Tap faucet,
Water dihydrogen monoxide,
Dictionary lexicon.
Plowback retained earnings is no different than these four, and allowing it to stay would set a bad precedent.
I think I should mention that
I had a short dialogue with the creator of this redirect that you may want to read to better inform your judgment before commenting.
Iaritmioawp (
talk)
09:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was procedural close. I've created a stub; until it's much expanded, it's probably going to work as a dab. --
BDD (
talk)
15:09, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
Sentencing guidelines exist in places other than the U.S.; presumably they also exist within the U.S. at levels other than the federal. –
Arms & Hearts (
talk)
12:19, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
reply
- There's probably an article to be had here. A dab is probably doable, but it could look a bit forced. Maybe just a stub with a sentence or two about what sentencing guidelines are, and mention the US and UK bodies that govern them? --
BDD (
talk)
15:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
reply
- This is a simple keep unless anyone wants to make it a stub/dab page, which they don't need an RfD to do. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough, 02:52, 10 November 2014 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:53, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
This "title" was a rumored video game that was possibly going to be made before the redirect's target's subject, but all searches that I made for this title do not show any valid notability claims. But, from what I found, this redirect's title does not refer to its target. Also, there is no mention of the redirect's title in the target article. And, from a search on a popular search engine, the redirect's title could also refer to something related to
Dungeons & Dragons, but I'm not finding any immediately clear retargeting options.
Steel1943 (
talk)
19:58, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- Note: I added
Final Fantasy IV Prototype to this nomination since that term specifically refers to the subject "
Final Fantasy 3.5" and is not mentioned in the target article.
Steel1943 (
talk)
20:04, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- D&D? Maybe someone made a D&D 3.5 campaign in the Final Fantasy world. Not sure why else the term would return D&D results. (Also, I so want to play that.) --
BDD (
talk)
21:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
History ofinformation technology auditing
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep as longstanding, a former page name, and only a weak typo. --
BDD (
talk)
14:52, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
Improbable, pointless and
completely unused redirect which has somehow survived since 2005
Mogism (
talk)
19:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:48, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
Nothing titled "CTY Parent" was ever mentioned in the target article.
[1]
Vanjagenije (
talk)
12:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Association of Lawyers in Government Corporation
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:47, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
Nothing of a kind is mentioned in the target article (not in current revision, not in any older revision
[2]).
Vanjagenije (
talk)
12:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:46, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
No "Gotanco" is mentioned in the article (not in current revision, not in any old revision
[3]).
Vanjagenije (
talk)
12:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pearlasia Gamboa (president of Melchizedek)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. --
Beland (
talk)
14:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
Highly improbable term for searching "Pearlasia Gamboa". totally useless redirect.
Vanjagenije (
talk)
12:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pearlie (Pearlasia Gamboa)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
This is highly unusual search term for "Pearlasia Gamboa". It is not useful at all.
Vanjagenije (
talk)
12:48, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
Nothing titled "Kobuto" is mentioned in the target article (not now, not in the old revisions before recent edits
[4]).
Vanjagenije (
talk)
12:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
International crimes of Beverly Hills
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
I don't understand the point of this redirect. It is too vague.
Vanjagenije (
talk)
12:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Angel of Music, or The Private Life of Giselle (2007) by Maria Andrianova
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. --
BDD (
talk)
14:41, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
Unlikely search term
MrLinkinPark333 (
talk)
03:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.