Delete - redirect is not needed and the article probably should have been deleted instead of redirected. The only text content appears to have been description and evaluation of the works of art, which was moved to Commons by File Upload Bot while preserving attribution to
User:Eloquence (the user who added the text content) in the upload log. –BLACK FALCON(
TALK)23:49, 16 December 2009 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
It is not the official "Lake of Venezuela" or the only lake so this redirect is incorrect. Maracaibo is not known as the Lake of Venezuela Tavix |
Talk 22:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete; presumably an article in the past, has solid view history; no edit history now. I can't think of anywhere to send the external visitors
Josh Parris04:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep from the target's history "12:17, 27 November 2009 JHunterJ (talk | contribs) m (2,503 bytes) (moved List of things described as headless to Headless (disambiguation): return to dab, clean up) (undo)". Two weeks after a page move is far too soon to get rid of the redirect without a really good reason. Keep it for now, reassess in a couple months.
Bradjamesbrown (
talk)
08:16, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
When I wrote that edit summary, I believe there were still incoming mainspace links to it. It was a dab page posing as a list, now it's a dab page and the links have been fixed. --
JHunterJ (
talk)
12:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete as nominator I don't see what good it would do to put off the deletion for a couple months. It seems to me that really good reasons have already been provided for why the redirect should be deleted.
Neelix (
talk)
16:53, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
No, Luke, I am your father
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Additional note: In contrast to many people's believe, Rh is not an abbreviation of Rhesus. It is the real name of the blood group system. Therefore, it makes sense to keep this name as the name of the article and keep
Rhesus blood group system just as a redirect as currently implemented. --
Firefly's luciferase (
talk)
07:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment: As I mentioned above.
Rh blood group system is now the main article. I am just asking to remove the redirect to Rhesus blood group system which leads to a cycling double redirect. It is just a technical problem that I cannot solve myself but have to ask an admin through this process here. The article will still be available through both key words. Thanks for understanding and solving the technical problem soon. --
Firefly's luciferase (
talk)
06:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I think I understand now. Is this what happened? You found
Rhesus blood group system and realised it was titled incorrectly, so you hit the move button and moved it to
Rh blood group system, the correct title. But it turns out that there were a bunch of redirects pointing to
Rhesus blood group system, and now they're all double-redirects (as
Rhesus blood group system became a redirect when you moved the article to
Rh blood group system), and as such not working, so: you've come here, asking for an admin to make the double redirects go away? If that's the problem, just wait a bit and a
WP:bot will come along and tidy everything up. I'm pretty sure I've seen a double-redirect bot running around here somewhere.
Josh Parris07:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
This is exactly what happened. I would have asked an admin first to delete the redirect and then move the page (move request) if I had realized that there was already a redirect from the new name to the old name. I learned something: check first. So, if you have already seen a bot running around, then it hopefully will be at this no longer used redirect soon. :-) Otherwise I am glad if an admin can solve the problem manually. Thanks. --
Firefly's luciferase (
talk)
07:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply