- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept with additional FoP status added. TLSuda ( talk) 01:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Querying this because of COM:FOP Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Unfree in Belgium as Gabriel Epstein is alive and hasn't been dead for 70 years yet. For us, this only means that we need to add {{ FoP-USonly|Belgium}}. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if this is simple enough to qualify as being below TOO, and I can't find a 'free' release on the source given.
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
10:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'll defer to consensus, but it seems liek a pure geometric pattern to me. There is no affirmative release on teh website, but there is no copyright claim on the work, and assuming it qualifies as PD-shape then an affirmative release is not necessary. The SJSU website offers the free download. BillTunell ( talk) 15:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- This might qualify for {{ PD-CAGov}}, although I don't know exactly how universities are governed in the United States.
- Page 1 of this file contains two logos: one {{ PD-textlogo}}, and one {{ Non-free logo}}. This logo is possibly more complex than both of those, although this is a matter of discussion. In either case, the situation is unclear, so we have to assume that the logo is unfree. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- If you're saying that you think this is more than a geometric pattern, then I'll take that at face value. But I take issue with "assuming" anything. No wiki image is assumed invalid once it has a claim of use. If there is a consensus that the claim of use is wrong, then delete it. BillTunell ( talk) 22:57, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept with non-free tags. TLSuda ( talk) 01:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:BPJPIICSS Logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Listed as {{ non-free logo}}, {{ GFDL}} and {{ cc-by-sa-3.0}}, but a logo can't be both unfree and freely licensed at the same time. There is no evidence that any of the free tags are correct. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept with non-free tags. TLSuda ( talk) 01:57, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:Threema lettering.svg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Missing source for the SVG code and permission from the coder.
Stefan2 (
talk)
21:15, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Permission is not an issue when the claim of use/tag is "PD-text". There can be no permission because there is no copyright. That being said, I'd insist on a source for the logo.
BillTunell (
talk)
23:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- PD-text can only be used when something is PD-text. A vectorisation is not PD-text as the copyright to the vectorisation part belongs to the person who made the vectorisation. See
Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. --
Stefan2 (
talk)
23:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- I was the user that recategorized this as PD-text. I appear to have jumped the gun on this one - many apologies, and feel free to revert. Malpass93! ( what I've been up to/ drop me a ___) 14:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- PD-text can only be used when something is PD-text. A vectorisation is not PD-text as the copyright to the vectorisation part belongs to the person who made the vectorisation. See
Adobe Systems, Inc. v. Southern Software, Inc. --
Stefan2 (
talk)
23:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Permission is not an issue when the claim of use/tag is "PD-text". There can be no permission because there is no copyright. That being said, I'd insist on a source for the logo.
BillTunell (
talk)
23:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept as non-free. TLSuda ( talk) 01:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- File:Black Duck Software logo.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The artwork to the left in the logo looks fairly complex. Dubious whether PD-textlogo is correct. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.