The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: File does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion.
AnomieBOT⚡09:04, 7 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The advertisment clearly does not show a copyright notice, as was normal, so that image in Billboard complies with the pre-1978 no notice licence. While the album cover that used the same photo a part of the design
File:Jeffair.jpg is certainly copyright: it is hard to tell which release of the album
this image is, but
this German pressing does show a copyright notice. However that does not change the fact that this image is free.
ww2censor (
talk)
11:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The ad copy says that the
album which used the photo for the cover on page 2, Surrealistic Pillow, was "their up-coming album". RCA chose to use the photo for the ad without copyright-protecting the ad. They also selected the photo for the album cover, which was available to the public after the photo was published in Billboard. The trade ad was published first with no copyright notice.
We hope (
talk)
13:52, 7 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The Billboard issue the ad was published in was January 7, 1967. The ad copy also says The Airplane began a coast to coast promotion tour at the beginning of January. According to Allmusic, Surrealistic Pillow was released in
February 1967.
We hope (
talk)
14:19, 7 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Yeah, that's more or less how it works. You think copyright is confusing now? A lot of US films and posters and whatnot are PD because people made little mistakes like this. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk)
12:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Original copyright registrations in artwork (includes photos) for 1967:
page 328 1967 registrations for "Jefferson Airplane"-Pandora Productions, Matthew Anthony Radofski, Saladin Productions.
page 273 Saladin Productions-Four figures in design created from photgraphic negative-Color serigraph.
page 269 Matthew Anthony Radofski-psychedelic poster
page 260 Pandora Productions-portfolio of 6 colored serigraphs.
No registrations by
Herb Greene, the photographer, or by RCA/Radio Corporation of America.
Keep per research done by We hope, which indicates that this file is public domain owing to a lack of copyright declaration at the time of first publishing. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk)
12:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.