The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- FASTILY (TALK) 00:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
Note per discussion with User:Fastly: The bottom of the flyer says "OVER". Which means the flyer had another side. So while User:Dominic claim that it wasn't published is false, there is still reason to doubt the copyright tag -- unless we see that other side, we can't say for sure whether or not there was any copyright notice. I am therefore not disputing this deletion, despite the incorrect reason for listing it. Infrogmation ( talk) 13:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
Apparenly not in the public domain. See User talk:Mjroots#Bank Hall windmill, Bretherton, Lancashire image where Ghughesarch ( talk · contribs) comments that it is a photograph taken by Donald Muggeridge, who was, AFAICT, still alive in 1983. The image is of poor quality, and thus I would argue against it being used under NFUR rules, as it apparently would fail at least criteria #1 of WP:NFC. Mjroots ( talk) 11:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on
Commons. Please
nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free.
AnomieBOT
⚡
18:11, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
reply