The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed.- FASTILY (TALK) 00:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC) reply
either the contractor still owns the copyright or it is transferred to the gov agency (but the the agency owns it). Saibo ( Δ) 23:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
I have changed the copyright tag to PD-Pre1978, as the images were published without notice of copyright prior to 1978, and therefore are in the public domain. As such, I am removing the "Potentially Unfree" tag. Katana0182 ( talk) 01:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed.- FASTILY (TALK) 00:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC) reply
either the contractor still owns the copyright or it is transferred to the gov agency (but the the agency owns it). Saibo ( Δ) 23:04, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
I have changed the copyright tag to PD-Pre1978, as the images were published without notice of copyright prior to 1978, and therefore are in the public domain. As such, I am removing the "Potentially Unfree" tag. Katana0182 ( talk) 01:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed.- FASTILY (TALK) 00:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC) reply
either the contractor still owns the copyright or it is transferred to the gov agency (but the the agency owns it). Saibo ( Δ) 23:05, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
I have changed the copyright tag to PD-Pre1978, as the images were published without notice of copyright prior to 1978, and therefore are in the public domain. As such, I am removing the "Potentially Unfree" tag. Katana0182 ( talk) 01:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep; concern addressed.- FASTILY (TALK) 00:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC) reply
either the contractor still owns the copyright or it is transferred to the gov agency (but the the agency owns it). Saibo ( Δ) 23:06, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply
I have changed the copyright tag to PD-Pre1978, as the images were published without notice of copyright prior to 1978, and therefore are in the public domain. As such, I am removing the "Potentially Unfree" tag. Katana0182 ( talk) 01:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC) reply