The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Skip3.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Possible copyright violation. Image appears before it was uploaded to Wikipedia in this 2005 September 14 archived copy of http://www.up.ac.za/maps/virtcamp/virtadmn.htm, with the text "Photos taken by Etna Verster, Corporate Communication." No evidence of a free license by the photographer. 84user ( talk) 04:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply
• Great find! Yes, this user frequently had copyright issues. Delete. – Quadell ^{( talk)} 17:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply

File:NTPU Logo.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• University logo with dubious free license. Switching to non-free is moot since the file is not used anywhere. Hairhorn ( talk) 05:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn, nevermind – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 18:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

File:JGSOM.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Editor who added the licensing tag was an IP, and there is no evidence it was the uploader just not being logged in. We can't assume that the uploader intended for the given license since they may have not added it themselves. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 14:03, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply

File:MyPoorDeadDog.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be taken from [1] Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 14:03, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Kulshan3b.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Although the intentions of the copyright holder in the given email are clear, he didn't specifically license them. The uploader can't choose a license for someone else's work unless the copyright holder explicitly stated that the given license is acceptable. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 14:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply

File:HumanRaceCalledOff.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Album cover, no proof the copyright holder released into the public domain. Orphaned. Acather96 ( talk) 20:05, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Danger ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Coco Rocha in Anna Sui Feb 2008, Photographed by Ed Kavishe for Fashion Wire Press.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS permission appears to be fake. Upload is possible sockpuppet of banned user that has resorted to this in the past. Source requires a login. Eeekster ( talk) 21:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.