The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Image claims to be PD, licensed GFDL CC-BY-SA-3.0. Myspace photo highly doubtful its free. εω ( talk) 02:05, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
F8 by
Athaenara (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA) A file with this name on
Commons is now visible.
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
This seems to be way beyond the standards of PD-textlogo, which is being abused on several TV station logos. Whatever the threshold of originality is, this is surely on the other side of it. Compare File:NBC logo.svg. ( ESkog)( Talk) 02:21, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
:^)
The work (as a whole) is more than basic geometry or text. It consists primarily of translucent, overlapping circles around a pincushion shape. Does a logo have to be 3D or shiny to be copyrightable? For comparison, we currently have the
NeXT (isometric cube) and
PG&E (right triangle on square) logos under fair use. Though a bit more refined than the CHCH logo, they're both less complex (for instance, featuring only solid colors). –
Minh Nguyễn (
talk,
contribs)
11:09, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
replyThe result of the discussion was: keep. Image is within the scope of {{ PD-textlogo}}. — ξ xplicit 22:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Another abuse of PD-textlogo. The color scheme, shading, and organization of elements renders this more than just a typeface. ( ESkog)( Talk) 02:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Another abuse of PD-textlogo. The "45" logo doesn't match any typeface I've ever seen. ( ESkog)( Talk) 02:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed as a non-free image. — ξ xplicit 20:43, 15 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Another abuse of PD-textlogo; the background image clearly represents a copyrightable work, even though the text on the front doesn't. ( ESkog)( Talk) 02:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. Image is within the scope of {{ PD-textlogo}}. — ξ xplicit 22:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Another abuse of PD-textlogo. A logo which is stylized to look like text doesn't automatically create a "typeface". ( ESkog)( Talk) 02:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply
1960s press photo from indystar.com - PD-self license is unlikely to be correct. dave pape ( talk) 02:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete: Album cover being used in article about the artist fails WP:NFC#Images #1. Also has no licence or fair use rationale. ww2censor ( talk) 05:18, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Since no claim of fair-use is made; sculpture retains copyright. Shell babelfish 17:41, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Depicted sculpture is probably copyrighted. The USA does not have freedom of panorama other than for buildings. Stifle ( talk) 08:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Photograph of a back album cover. Cover does not look simple enough to be considered PD. J Milburn ( talk) 09:33, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:30, 25 September 2009 (UTC) reply
The page Tróndur Bogason was deleted per PROD. In addition, there is no source, author, or media description on the file, making it difficult to know whether this might be an unfree file. Cnilep ( talk) 15:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC) Bogi ( talk) 22:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC) No problem, I can upload it again. I have the authors blessing to use the picture. I will try to add details about the picture next time I upload it in order so satisfy the verifyability of the picture reply