The result of the discussion was: Not deleted
PD painting, but per the source, the entire library of images are copyrighted. Probably available to use as fair-use as the image is a very small resolution. -- Retropunk ( talk) 21:09, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Tagged NPD instead
This professional headshot is published here. The page carries the notice: © 2007 Robert Gilder. Uploader ( KickNYC ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) highly unlikely to be the copyright holder and provides no permission from them to release it under {{ cc-by-sa-3.0}} Voceditenore ( talk) 08:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
kickNYC KickNYC ( talk) 19:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC) i now have express permission from the photographer Jacques Chuilon for use of this photo in greg reinhart's wiki page. i just have to figure out who gets a copy of his email and what to do next. i need at least another week to read everyone's tips on how to do this. thanks. jacques chuilon said that he also took the headshot that is posted on the Glider website, although it is a different one. reply
i need to figure out if i can simply email this permission to creavtivecommons, and what license designation, or must the photographer do this himself?
eta: i forwarded the photographer's permission to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org KickNYC ( talk) 21:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
—Preceding unsigned comment added by KickNYC ( talk • contribs) 20:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
eta: i want to make the picture bigger and the caption look better. i will ask mr. ghuilon if he wants a photo credit on his 2 photos. KickNYC ( talk) 21:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Tagged {{ npd}} instead. – Quadell ( talk) 02:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Professional production shot, clearly marked: © CLAIRE BESSE. Uploader ( KickNYC ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) highly unlikely to be the copyright holder and provides no permission from them to release it under {{ cc-by-sa-3.0}} Voceditenore ( talk) 08:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
kickNYC KickNYC ( talk) 19:44, 29 May 2009 (UTC) i now have express permission from the photographer Claire Besse for use of this photo in greg reinhart's wiki page. i just have to figure out who gets a copy of her email and what to do next. i need at least another week to read everyone's tips on how to do this. thanks. i need to figure out if i can simply email this permission to creavtivecommons, and what license designation, or must the photographer do this herself? reply
eta: i forwarded the photographer's permission to:
permissions-commons@wikimedia.org KickNYC ( talk) 21:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Tagged {{ npd}} instead. – Quadell ( talk) 02:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC) reply
This one is borderline, the uploader ( KickNYC ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) may be the photographer/copyright holder, but does not make this claim. Given the previous two, this may not be a free image Voceditenore ( talk) 08:49, 24 May 2009 (UTC) kickNYC KickNYC ( talk) 19:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC) kickNYCsays: reply
i now have express permission from the photographer Jacques Chuilon for use of this photo in greg reinhart's wiki page. i just have to figure out who gets a copy of his email and what to do next. i need at least another week to read everyone's tips on how to do this. thanks.
i need to figure out if i can simply email this permission to creavtivecommons, and what license designation, or must the photographer do this himself?
eta: i forwarded the photographer's permission to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org KickNYC ( talk) 21:24, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
—Preceding unsigned comment added by KickNYC ( talk • contribs) 20:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Now tagged as non-free
poster listed as CC-3.0 but there is no justification for this. Appears to be a clearly commercial copyrighted image Peripitus (Talk) 13:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Now tagged as non-free
poster listed as CC-3.0 but there is no justification for this. Appears to be a clearly commercial copyrighted image Peripitus (Talk) 13:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Now tagged as non-free
poster listed as CC-3.0 but there is no justification for this. Appears to be a clearly commercial copyrighted image Peripitus (Talk) 13:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Peripitus (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
23:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
Appears to be a screen capture from a movie rather than a user-created public-domain image. I think that this is not free but replaceable copyrighted Peripitus (Talk) 13:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
ESkog (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
20:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
Signed promotional photo apparently - not a free image Peripitus (Talk) 13:32, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Free licence here but linked to a flickr upload that states "all rights reserved" - Peripitus (Talk) 13:36, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Deleted- FASTILY (TALK) 01:41, 26 February 2012 (UTC) reply
All tagged {{cc-by-3.0}} by uploader. For File:Steve.jpg see http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/73132017/Bongarts. See also User talk:Boxing245 for previous history of image copyright problems. 58.8.240.94 ( talk) 17:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Definetly looks like a batch of copy-vio uploads... - J Greb ( talk) 19:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Quadell (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡
02:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
reply
Source is here: http://www.mopock.com/ZOIDS/photos/LigerZERO-X.html
On the main photos page, the original photographer says ""My own Toy ZOIDS" photos may not be reproduced without prior permission from the webmaster!", which does not go with the public domain upload tag. Storchofdoom ( talk) 23:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply