The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The Flickr source page contains images from a very large variety of sources, and this one is claimed to be ARR anyway. Either way, probably a copyvio. J Milburn ( talk) 09:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Very inconsistent sourcing, I doubt this is public domain in the source country, let alone the US. J Milburn ( talk) 09:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Image is clearly a lot younger than that. J Milburn ( talk) 10:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
No information on author or date, no way to verify PD claim. J Milburn ( talk) 10:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Very vague source information, no way to verify PD claim. J Milburn ( talk) 10:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
She was born in the '40s, image is clearly younger than claimed. J Milburn ( talk) 10:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
I doubt a photo so young will be PD. J Milburn ( talk) 10:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
I doubt such a young image is in the public domain. J Milburn ( talk) 10:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Credits within image suggest this is a copyvio. J Milburn ( talk) 10:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 10:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 10:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 10:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 10:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploaded with a batch of images that included live shots, album covers and publicity photo, all claimed own work. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn ( talk) 10:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Uploaded by User:CoxBv under a suspect claim of being self-made photo, since it lacks any metatag information, it is provided in a pretty small size (which is quite unusual for these kinds of pictures) and, most importantly, comes from a user with a questionable upload history (two uploads who later turned out to be copyright violations). Angelo ( talk) 13:44, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
While I dont doubt the uploader did take this photo, I wonder if the license is appropriate here. While taken in a public place, this is a screen shot of proprietary software. It's use in the monorail article certainly meets the requirements "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic" but would this image require some sort of a release by the software developer (WED)?
RadioFan (
talk)
16:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Looks like a logo. I doubt it is released under a CC license. J Milburn ( talk) 17:36, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
The original uplader listed a rationale with a statement from the creator "You absolutely have my permission! What an honor it will be to have my photo showing on Gackt's Wikipedia entry!" It appears the creator may not have wished / known about use on wikipedia involving general free licensing [1] and has added copyright claims. -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Protonk ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Album cover, I doubt it has been released under a free license. Unused. J Milburn ( talk) 20:36, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Clearly an old image, I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this file. J Milburn ( talk) 23:26, 5 July 2009 (UTC) reply