Previous peer review: 10 September 2006
We have done quite a bit of work updating this article based on the points raised in the previous peer review. Before submitting it as a GAC or FAC, I'd like one more round of comments to try to make that process go as smoothly as possible.
I've also addressed the issues raised by the lazy automatic reviewer. There are three points remaining:
Please be as specific as possible in your suggestions. Thank you. Anomie 15:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
With all the extra references I've added while waiting for someone to respond to this review, it now triggers a "summary style" warning from the automatic reviewer for being over 50 KB. However, after stripping the images, tables, footnotes, references, and such as recommended by WP:SIZE it is under 30 KB (and under 5000 words). Anomie 18:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC)