Previous peer review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get some feedback about issues that need to be resolved. After that, I would like to nominate it for a featured article.

Thanks for you cooperation! URDNEXT ( talk) 18:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Why information of small DLC packs and release information of the bigger ones were removed? Replacing it with pure plot summary isn't an improvement. -- Mika1h ( talk) 19:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC) reply

It wasn't on purpose. I accidentaly deleted them while taking the plot summaries from the synopsis section. Can you revert it? URDNEXT ( talk) 20:32, 7 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Random notes...

• Avoid standalone setences - try to incorporate them into paragraphs.
• Make sure everything has a citation.

Done, what now? URDNEXT ( talk) 23:01, 7 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Let facts speak for themselves - see [1] - not sure if there are other examples of this

Ok, now I get it. I'll try to fix some of the issues. URDNEXT ( talk) 23:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Forthcoming... Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^{( talk)} 17:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks, man! I appreciate it! URDNEXT ( talk) 17:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC) reply