Previous peer review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want it checked for compliance with summary style in advance of a Good Article nomination. In particular, that sub-sections by season are compliant.

Thanks, C 679 17:25, 5 January 2014 (UTC) reply

• Done some extensive copyediting, in small discrete edits with transparent (if slightly broad) edit summaries. Feel free to revert any changes as you see fit. --  Ohc  ^¡digame! 04:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC) reply