A script has been used to generate a semi-
automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and
house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click
here. Thanks,
APRt03:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)reply
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…I want it to become at least a GA and future FA article. Please comment with any concerns, edits, errors. Cheers.
Is the Austin-Love match with Brisco, Patterson, and McMahon the one at Over The Edge (I haven't read ahead yet)? It's unclear when you say "McMahon announced a match".
I Changed it. Y
Was The Nation of Domination simply going by The Nation at this time?
All awful lot of the text is wikilinked. I think the article might suffer from overlinking.
The Other On-Screen Talent table is awkwardly placed, at least it is on my screen. The table is messing up the right-hand justification of the Results. Maybe moving it up or to the right would look better.
By more consistent with the date linking. When you write out the whole date (ie.
June 11998) link both parts. There are places in the article where you write out the whole date and it isn't linked. If you only write out the month and day (ie. June 1) don't link it. Actually, it might help with the overlinking problem if you eliminate the year in most cases when writing out the date and de-link the month and day.