A script has been used to generate a semi-
automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and
house style; it can be found on the
automated peer review page for July 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I wish to nominate the article for FA status. The article is currently a "Good Article." I would like comments/suggestions for improvements or changes that should be made before nominating it for a FA.
There are several redlinks throughout the articles. If this were to be a featured article, they should either be removed or stubs should be created for them (the latter would be preferable).
Done - I created articles for most of the red links. A few of them linked to individuals who don't meet notability, so they have been de-linked. -
NatureBoyMD (
talk)
03:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Go through the article and make sure dates are linked at their first appearance, and that's all. For example, in the Reds era, 1987 and 1989 are not linked, then later in that paragraph, they are. It's a proofreading thing.
Done - I think I got them all. I left the year in the lead because it seems right and in full dates where autoformatting comes in. -
NatureBoyMD (
talk)
20:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)reply
The uniforms section has no references. A good guide that I was given is that every extraordinary claim and every paragraph should have at least one reference.