A script has been used to generate a semi-
automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and
house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click
here. Thanks,
APRt01:54, 11 February 2008 (UTC)reply
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'd like to see how far this article could be taken as I look to get
York City F.C. related articles to
WP:FT status. Sources on it are limited, so even GA is looking tough. Thanks,
Mattythewhite (
talk)
21:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Hey Matty, that's good work considering how little I expect there is out there on the topic. Just a few minor points:
Don't think the first sentence needs that comma in the middle, although personally I prefer the "F.C." to have dots, especially given that that's how the club's own article is titled (also the dots are used in the infobox within this article)
"A major problem of the ground was its relative inaccessibility" is a bit garbled, maybe try "a major problem for the club was the ground's relatively inaccessible location"
From the instructions: "Please do not include any images, such as done/not done templates with tick/cross graphics"
APRt02:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)reply
I used
this geocoding site to add it. I just did it by eye, which on maximum zoom is more than good enough I reckon (within a metre or so?). I think the co-ordinates within the Google URL you supplied could be used for a more scientific method, but I haven't looked into that too deeply as yet. --
Jameboy (
talk)
01:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)reply
You don't mention where the road called Fulfordgate fits in. Did it pre-date the ground or was it built afterwards?
I've found OS maps from 1931 and 1936 that answer my 2nd and 3rd points. Fulfordgate (the road) and Eastward Avenue replaced the ground after its demolition. Hope you like the image I added. --
Jameboy (
talk)
23:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)reply