Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it was originally sent to AfD for being too promotional in nature, but received a significant rewrite and expansion with sources from CaroleHenson ( see original version here) and was voted as keep just now. On the talk page though Cullen328 commented that "the article needs a major trimming", and in response, I have decided to seek a formal review process - which has the additional side-benefit of evaluating the reworked article for potential GA status.
Thanks, <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 19:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles. [?]
- Update
Done– CaroleHenson ( talk) 16:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non- fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload. [?]
- Update I'll see if maybe I could find something about disability, adaptive technology, or other related topics that might apply here.
- If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one. [?]
- Update I wasn't able to find one for Ruh and added a photo request on the talk page. I'll send out an email request for an image to one of Ruh's organizations.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 16:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- The script has spotted the following contractions: didn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
- Update It was within a comment, but I went ahead and spelled it out.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 16:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.