Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I think it could eventually (sooner than later) be a potential FA candidate. After a peer review, I'll ask for a copyedit as well.
It'd be cool to see what an editor who doesn't really edit video game articles thinks about this one (I think it'd offer a valuable perspective, sort of a " fresh pair of eyes" type of thing), but I'd be happy and appreciative with any peer commentary.
Much thanks :-) Soulbust ( talk) 05:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template. And, since you are still seeking your first successful FAC, I suggest seeking a FA mentor and start reviewing FACs now to build goodwill among the FAC regulars. Z1720 ( talk) 13:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)