I've listed this article for peer review because it's currently Start class and I would love to get at to at least GA status but I'm unsure of how to proceed.
I plan to give it the full look-over when I've got a bit more time, but the main thing that jumps out is the lack of in-line references, of which there's only one in the whole article. I realise that there are sources listed at the bottom, but a GA/FA is expected to have in-line references against all the key facts. See
WP:CITE for more on this, and feel free to drop me a line at my talk page if you need any assistance
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 18:39, 17 December 2007 (UTC)reply
In progress
The references was the main thing I noticed. A couple more things really jump out as per
WP:MOS are linking to relevant pages, like competitions (particularly in the honours section), years in football, and the ground section; making sure years use endashes, e.g. 2007–08, and in results e.g. 1–0; and I'm not sure you need all the club officials, e.g. marketing manager, masseur, etc, etc - just the key ones.
Done
Notable former players is also
WP:POV. If you can change this section to either prose, or as a list of players who went on to play league football with maybe the header to see the relevant category.
A script has been used to generate a semi-
automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and
house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click
here. Thanks,
APRt 01:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Semi-Automatic Review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic
javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on
WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]