2 Hours Doing Nothing

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I would like to bring this up to a higher status (what other than FA) after being brought to GA status on Dec 5. Any comments on flaws, I would love to have it on this PR to simplify the FA nomination later on. Pinging Jeromi Mikhael as page creator, Ravenpuff and Armadillopteryx as editors with significant quantity of edits, Some Dude From North Carolina as GA reviewer, and Chompy Ace as GA review resolver. Forgive me if my ping bothers you.

Thanks, Gerald WL 11:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply

I will try to take a look in the next week or so. I will unfortunately be a little slow because I'm very busy IRL and have a couple other things I've been trying to finish up on Wiki. Armadillo pteryx 22:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC) reply

If this peer review is in preparation for a FAC, I would recommend adding it to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar as it could help to attract more reviews. It is completely up to you though. I just wanted to bring this to your attention. If you do add it there, then please remember to remove it when you close this PR. Aoba47 ( talk) 20:51, 17 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Aoba47,  Done. Thanks for recommending, hope it helps attracting more people. Gerald WL 09:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Hey there, just checking in! Armadillopteryx, Aoba47, do you feel like it on commenting on this article? I recently added a "Spin-off" section, see if you can comment on it. Gerald WL 09:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Unfortunately, I will not have the time to do a review for this. I would recommend incorporating the "Spin-off" section into one of the previous section as it is not encouraged to have a single-sentence section. Aoba47 ( talk) 16:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Aoba47,  Done: incorporated it in "Virality and reception," at the end of paragraph 1, removing the outrageous "100 hours" specificity which seems overly-trivial to be mentioned. Gerald WL 16:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC) reply

I will take a look when I get a moment; I'm swamped with work this week, so it may take a bit before I can find a chunk of time to look at this with the attention it deserves. Armadillo pteryx 00:18, 22 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Hey, I just want to circle back here and follow up. Unfortunately, due to a life change I had a few weeks ago, the time I have available for Wikipedia has significantly shrunk, and I don't foresee myself being able to do a proper run-through of this article in the near future. Really sorry I can't be of more help right now, but I wish you luck with this review and with the eventual FAC. Armadillo pteryx 21:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Armadillopteryx, that's totally understandable. Wikipedia is a volunteer thing, anyways. I also don't really think much issues are present here, so it would prolly be good for a FAC. Gerald WL 07:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply