Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because the GAC2 reviewer suggested some copyediting at PR.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR)
16:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: I agree that the article needs copyediting, but PR is not the place to seek it. The reviewers here do some incidental c/e as they go, but they are generally spread too thin to polish whole articles. You might ask someone at
WP:PRV or trade c/e favors with another Wikipedia editor. Copyediting this article does not look like a really big job because the text is fairly short. What's needed is careful proofing and a bit of polish. Here are a few other suggestions or comments:
I hope these suggestions prove helpful. If so, please consider reviewing another article, especially one from the PR backlog at WP:PR; that is where I found this one. I don't usually watch the PR archives or check corrections or changes. If my comments are unclear, please ping me on my talk page. Finetooth ( talk) 19:31, 14 August 2010 (UTC)