![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Archive 40 | ← | Archive 42 | Archive 43 | Archive 44 | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | → | Archive 50 |
Leave image as USonly-ineligible, though if one can clearly ID how TOO works in PHilippenes as to this image, that can be changed later. -- MASEM ( t) 23:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Is this logo copyrightable in the Philippines? George Ho ( talk) 06:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Keep as PD US only, until confirmation on nature of TOO in Philippines. -- MASEM ( t) 23:16, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Is this logo copyrightable in the Philippines? George Ho ( talk) 06:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
This seems to be sourced to a book from 1701. If so, then it is PD-old, not unfree. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
{{
PD-art|PD-old}}
. However, if it's a redrawing rather than a photograph, the uploader (or whomever drew it) probably has some copyright interest, in which case this may be an original publication, and therefore failing NFCC #4. I somewhat suspect this may be the case because, looking at the versions of Armorial général de France to which I do have access, have only been digitized in black and white, and do not appear to contain any figures as opposed to heraldic descriptions. That is, I believe the uploader, or someone else, may have created the image based off a description in one of these books, rather than something printed in one.
User:Sulbud or
User:Prince of Sulbod (the former's userpage redirects to the latter's) needs to respond to this. —/
Mendaliv/
2¢/
Δ's/
20:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Non-Admin Closure: There is no consensus in this discussion, the most recent relevant Commons discussion, or on recent WP:NFC discussion to blanket remove pre-1972 fair use sound files. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 23:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Pre 1972 sound sample, per Stefan 2 Fair use cannot be relied on. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:48, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is the overuse of the image in 6 articles violates WP:NFCC. A fair assessment shows that the image could likely be used in 2-3 articles, including the painter, the work, and one period example. Since the accompanying content is 100 % the same in the three period articles, the suggestion of the painting staying in 20th-century Western Art (being the most specific period) is the best choice. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 22:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Is this file really needed on all 6 articles? especially when it has its own article? Werieth ( talk) 11:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is the images should not be removed, although no discussion of applicable policy and where the non-free images stand in said policy has taken place. Editors should, in future unrelated situations, remember what Masem points out: Merging images in a user-created montage does not work to reduce non-free, a collage still counts for as many individual images that it includes. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 23:09, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Do we really need 5 non-free files for this article? Werieth ( talk) 15:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Image is passes the Threshold of Originality as the image contains gloss effects. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 22:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Starting to think this is pd-ineligible; it is just a sphere with basic gloss effects in it (even more basic than the previous) ViperSnake151 Talk 18:35, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFCC in two articles and should be removed. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
In Culture of Georgia (U.S. state) and Arts in Atlanta, the image fails WP:NFCC#8, as the book cover is not the subject of discussion in the article, but rather the image is being used decoratively. RJaguar3 | u | t 03:35, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFCC in the article and should be removed. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:04, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
In Culture of Georgia (U.S. state), the image is being used entirely decoratively, in violation of WP:NFCC#8. RJaguar3 | u | t 03:38, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFCC in one article and should be removed. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#10c in one article. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFCC#10c in one article and should be removed as this issue has not been addressed. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:09, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#10c in one article. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFCC in one article and the image has previously been removed. Tagged as Orphaned fair use. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:11, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10c in Timothy Lee Barnwell. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFCC in one article and has previously been removed. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10c in Timothy Lee Barnwell. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:27, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Image has been removed from listed article. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10c in Timothy Lee Barnwell. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:27, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image is not above the TOO and therefore is pd-textlogo. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#10c in one article. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFLISTS in one article and should be removed. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFLISTS in List of Korean War flying aces. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFLISTS in one article and should be removed. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFLISTS in List of Korean War flying aces. Stefan2 ( talk) 01:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: WP:BOLD closure as there is no opposition to the image being in the public domain. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
1940s postcard. It's a bit dubious if things like this were renewed, so likely PD. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFCC#1 as it could be replaced by a free image. Note: There is another deletion discussion open: Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 January 28#File:George Ferguson manifesto.jpg-- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
The subject, George Ferguson (architect), is alive, kicking, still making public appearances as Mayor of Bristol and still wearing red trousers. There is therefore no true bar to creating a free replacement. William Avery ( talk) 08:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFLISTS and should be removed. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFLISTS in List of Korean War flying aces. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:58, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFLISTS and should be removed. (see above discussion) -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFLISTS in List of Korean War flying aces. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:58, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFLISTS and should be removed. (see above discussion) -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:31, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFLISTS in List of Korean War flying aces. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Previously deleted by Admin Mark Arsten -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:34, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Too simple so ineligble? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is the use of two covers in this situation is acceptable and meets criteria of WP:NFCC. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:36, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
This article has two different covers. I added details about the racy cover. I wrote the details about alt cover as "different", but I can't find sources discussing the alt cover. Does use of both covers meet NFCC? George Ho ( talk) 08:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus supports the inclusion of an episode poster. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:37, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
I found the poster that promotes this episode. I also found the drawing promo. Should either image be used? George Ho ( talk) 18:40, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus supports using a movie poster, and in this situation the re-release poster is acceptable. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:42, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Should I use either the VHS release poster or the screenshot to replace the re-release poster? George Ho ( talk) 19:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: There is no consensus for the use of either described image. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:47, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Should I use the poster of streaking Homer to represent the episode? George Ho ( talk) 10:14, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
What about the 300-parody poster? -- George Ho ( talk) 22:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: There is no consensus to support the inclusion of the listed poster. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:47, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
I hope the poster represents this episode. This should be the last request I make about posters of episodes. George Ho ( talk) 10:23, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is non-free image is replaceable and has been tagged for deletion. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Uh... is any user allowed to upload their copyright work into Wikipedia services? Blurred Lines 17:44, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is it is proper to remove logos from lists of episodes as it should only be used on the main article. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Recently, there has been altercation with the removals of the logos from the lists of episodes of Family Guy, American Dad!, and maybe even more to be exact. I posted on PeeJay2k3's talk page about this situation, and his responds was this. Do you agree with the conclusion that non free TV logos that are used in list of episodes should be all removed? Blurred Lines 05:18, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image is pd-textlogo. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Is this {{ PD-textlogo}}? Stefan2 ( talk) 22:58, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is screenshot is pd-ineligible whereas photo is shown to be PD-self. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:54, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Is this {{ PD-ineligible}}? See for example Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:08, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image is pd-textlogo. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
PD-logo? RJaguar3 | u | t 01:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFCC in duplicate use, but image has previously been removed from article. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC in IOS 7: used twice in the article, but only has one FUR. Second use fails WP:NFG. Current revision fails WP:NFCC#3b. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:26, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Image has previously been removed from article. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 03:59, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFG in IOS 7. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is non-free images fail WP:NFCC and have all been removed -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 04:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
The non-free images in this article fail WP:NFCC. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image below the TOO and therefore PD. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 04:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
The FUR is incorrect as the article isn't specifically dedicated as a whole to a discussion of this cover, but maybe the cover is below the threshold of originality? Stefan2 ( talk) 22:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Surely this logo is PD-textlogo? -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 02:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
PD-text image, tag changed
This looks like PD-Text to me (text is so simple as to not be copyrightable, Olympic rings are PD). Thoughts? — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 00:06, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
This is {{ PD-textlogo}}, right? Stefan2 ( talk) 16:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
All participants but one agree that musical notations are superfluous. The counter-argument of Wikidwitch falls flat against fundamentals policies: Wikipedia is meant to impart free knowledge; in fact, it goes a long way to stress on the "free" part. As for removing some of the audio samples, I can see that there is a consensus on doing so but nothing on how to do it. I advise either a bold edit (which may follow with BRD sequences) or more discussions. However, keeping this discussion thread open won't lead to said discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codename Lisa ( talk • contribs) 00:33, 9 February 2014
I cant see justification for 18 non-free files. Werieth ( talk) 16:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
As a result of this discussion (direct or indirect), number of non-free images in the article are reduced to five (from the original eight). Mac OS X dock image is deleted, Windows 8.1 screenshot survived deletion on Commons, Windows 8 screenshot moved to Commons. Argument for removing Windows 7 screenshot can also be made, on the grounds of redundancy, but in this discussion there is no consensus in favor of its immediate removal. Codename Lisa ( talk) 11:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
I cant see justification for 8 non-free files when we have free examples (Unix based OSes) Werieth ( talk) 20:34, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is the image fails WP:NFCC for being used on too many articles. And should therefore only be used on the main article. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 11:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Is this file really needed on 9 different articles? Werieth ( talk) 15:38, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image fails WP:NFG and should be removed from the specified article. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 19:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Jeff Wall Mimic.jpg is being used in violation of WP:NFG with zero supporting critical commentary Werieth ( talk) 23:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Procedural close as there are more specific discussions about specific images on the articles talk page and below at WP:NFCR. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 19:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
How many unfree files does this article need? There appears to be a dispute over the arrest photo in the Drug use and violence section. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 16:04, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is the non-free images are of acceptable use in the article with proper sourcing. User:Bus stop should be reminded that Wikilawyering is not an acceptable form of discussion and arguing against someone who is trying to assist your case for inclusion is rather unhelpful. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 19:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
I cant see justification for all 7 files on this article Werieth ( talk) 20:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: As the work is now in the public domain, all non-free recordings are replaceable by free ones thereby failing WP:NFCC#1 and should be removed accordingly. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 19:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Given that the work is PD-1923 all the non-free files are replaceable Werieth ( talk) 21:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is non-free images on this article fail WP's non-free policies and should therefore be removed. As of now, it looks as if there are not any non-free files included in the article, but if one is found, any user can remove that image per the consensus established in this discussion. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 19:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia which may have articles about everything which has notability. Every independent country in the world is notable enough to write about. I think everyone would agree on that statement.
The most prominent symbol of an independent country is its coat of arms. It may not be the most well-known symbol (that is normally the flag), but it is arguably the most prominent, as it stands for the government and its power, is displayed at central government buildings, at embassies, at border crossings, on official stamps and on the cover of passports etc. So I think the coat of arms of an independent country is notable enough to be displayed on Wikipedia. To display these coats of arms together and with links to the articles about each one of them is what an encyclopedia should be about, in my opinion. This is encyclopedic, fair and well within the limits of what is allowed for the images we have. I believe that the use of these works, to illustrate the object in question together with its corresponding symbols for other countries, where no freer equivalent is available on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law.
Some people think that some (but not all) coats of arms should not be allowed to be displayed on that page. This is not consistent. Either we have an encyclopedic gallery of the coats of arms of all independent nations, or we delete the gallery all together. To treat some of the coats of arms as not free enough for this gallery is not rational.
The way they want the gallery to be displayed, seems to indicate they wouldn't even think it proper if the images they find to be non-free would be replace by other, acctually free images. They want these coats of arms not to be present at all in the gallery, as far as I understand. Arms Jones ( talk) 02:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Even if this debate is not over (far from it, it seems), I have made another suggestion at Talk:Gallery of country coats of arms#Suggested change to this page. If you would be so kind to give an opinion there? Arms Jones ( talk) 11:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Do the other users support replacing the non-free coats of arms with a placeholder image (the image created by Arms Jones, my suggestion, or something else)? SiBr4 ("CyberFour") ( talk) 20:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
What do you think about the new style of the gallery now implemented under A and B? Is that enough for the use of all images? Arms Jones ( talk) 11:15, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: WP:BOLDly fixed issues. No longer concern. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 19:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#10c in one article. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:57, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus and evidence show the copyright of the image was likely not renewed and therefore the image is in the public domain. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 23:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Violates WP:NFLISTS and WP:NFCC#10c in List of works by Edward Hopper. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is there is no evidence supporting that this file was created by NASA, and therefore the image fails WP:NFCC#10a for not having an appropriate source and WP:NFCC#1 as being replaceable by free NASA created images. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 19:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
If the NASA claim is correct, then it is {{ PD-USGov-NASA}}. Insufficiently sourced. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:24, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: WP:BOLDly removed image from list article per WP:NFLISTS and from artist's article per WP:NFG. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#10c in two articles. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: No source given for image. Image is nowhere to be found at Illinois archives. Removed and tagged for deletion. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Incomplete source, see WP:NFCC#10a. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is for image removal for failing WP:NFCC in multiple articles and containing non-free Sega imagery that is not relevant to the articles. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in one article and WP:NFCC#10c in the other. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is for the removal of some non-free files in the article. No specific non-free files have been discussed, but a few have been removed as a result of this discussion. If further discussion on the non-free content of this article is required, specific images should be discussed by the nominator for why they are not needed. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
I really dont think 17 non-free files are needed. Werieth ( talk) 13:20, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: As image is only used in one article, and the discussion is about removal (which would lead to deletion) the image should be more appropriately discussed at WP:FFD. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
The use in All Monsters Attack violates WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10c. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 11:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: WP:BOLDly fixed WP:NFCC#10c issues. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#10c in one article. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is to remove all non-free files except the Hoth AT-AT and the AT-ST. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Cant we trim this down to 1-2 examples? Werieth ( talk) 20:11, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: WP:BOLDly updated to PD-textlogo. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Too simple. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:47, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: File fails WP:NFCC#3b and potentially WP:NFCC#8. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
I don't think that WP:NFCC#3b permits us to include four pages of a catalogue, but maybe this is the entire catalogue? In that case, it might qualify for {{ PD-US-no notice}}. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is image is below WP:TOO and therefore PD-textlogo. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Is this perhaps below the threshold of originality? The three lines to the left do not look particularly artistic, and the rest is just text: "여성가족부" and "Ministry of Gender Equality & Family". Stefan2 ( talk) 22:56, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Image is only used in one article, there is no WP:NFCC#10c issue anymore. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#10c in one article. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:22, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is non-free images except the lead image and her apology violate WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8 and have been previously removed. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
There are too many non-free images in this article. See WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 14:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: WP:BOLDly removed violation per WP:NFLISTS. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#10c in one article. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:37, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Consensus is there are too many non-free images on article and that OneNote and Powerpoint images are not necessary. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 23:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
We dont need 4 screenshots for the different programs that make up the suite in addition to the primary logo image Werieth ( talk) 01:56, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Image is only used in Waar now, no violations present. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 20:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10c in Pakistan. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:17, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Image is not used in any articles. Tagged for deletion. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 23:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Superseded by an OGL release of a higher resolution version from the IWM. Fæ ( talk) 08:40, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Withdrawn due to better quality version. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 21:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
This logo is also PD-textlogo? -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 02:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Non-Admin Closure: Image has been moved to File:SW Logo Black no symbol.jpg but has been nominated for deletion at WP:FFD. Discussion should continue there. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 21:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Simple text. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Can't find any reason this shouldn't be PD (There's some cavaets on US Mint images but this does not appear to fall into those.) -- MASEM ( t) 15:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Why is this marked as fair use? Is there any reason why this isn't simply {{ PD-USGov-money}}? Stefan2 ( talk) 13:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Is this album cover PD-text? It seems to be just simple fonts. -- ТимофейЛее Суда. 01:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)