The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is another clean up effort for the
Video games'inactive project clean up task force. The page nominated has been tagged as inactive since February 2008 and has no substantive edit history on either the main page or the talk page, which similarly indicates little to no interest. Should interest arise, I also believe that it would work better as a task force of WP:VG.
If someone wants to, they can recreate it in the future, but with so few edits (12 in total?, a few of which are bot edits), I see no reason to do so. Even redirecting isn't really plausible with no sizable edit history, I feel.
Izno (
talk)
05:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete - Non-proposed or supported project. It doesn't even appear to be filled-out properly. Note that the editor in question still appears to be very active in "Tales of" articles, though when the project was mentioned at
WT:VG (by myself) there was no other interest expressed. If, at some point, interest does arise, it can be re-created. JohnnyMrNinja08:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete: I'd equate this to the
WikiProject Dynasty Warriors (MfD). It is a small scope project that never really got off the ground for what ever reason. There is no discussion history (2 edits: 1 bot notice and 1 page move), the project page only has a short history of design edits and Wikipedia related maintenance. At the very least, it could be moved to a task force under
WP:VG, but I'm in favor of deleting it. And as Izno has stated, it would probably work better as a task force should interest increases down the road. (
Guyinblack25talk16:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC))reply
Delete: For the reasons above. I think that it's lack of history, content and inactivity means that it is unnecessary and unsuitable to redirect.
Natcong (
talk)
20:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.