The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep I don't know who or what this page is attacking, I personally do not see this attacking anyone or anything. If someone doesn't want to read the page, they don't have to. I don't believe any valid rationale to delete this page has been put forward. -
GBfan19:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Who is this libeling? What legal threats are being made by this essay?
WP:PROFANE is a content guideline. This isn't encyclopedic content, it is a humorous essay. -
GBfan21:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep No evidence of an attack. If "not everyone wants to read this" were a valid rationale for deletion, no entry could survive a deletion nomination.
EricEnfermero (
Talk)
21:41, 4 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Appropriate, direct humour for an important issue, one which the target audience frequently has difficulty grasping in normal language. Per the essay,
WP:BLOCKXfDWatcher for five minutes for causing several people to unnecessarily read the page. --
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
00:27, 7 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Not only funny, but also a good critical piece about how the community often fails to deal with minor but persistent issues. ~
Rob13Talk20:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.