- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Merge CambridgeBayWeather ( talk) 09:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Bulma
Relisted. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:34, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Article_Incubator#Time_limit, [c]ontent intended for mainspace should not be kept forever on subpages, ... This article has not been edited for over 12 months. Should be deleted per WP:STALEDRAFT. Also, see comments at previous MfD: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Group of stale articles from Article Incubator. Illia Connell ( talk) 19:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 19:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:34, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- If it is unworthy, let it be deleted routinely under WP:CSD#G13. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 05:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as an unattributed copy of http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Bulma&oldid=404400507 or thereabouts. Bulma is no a redirect. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 05:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Keeping this MfD open week after week is admin-making Wikipedia a battleground, when the community long ago showed that they did not want to discuss this particular set of MfD nominations. This discussion should have been closed after the first seven days. The nominator last edited Wikipedia on May 29, and has never been available to respond to a request to withdraw this nomination, a request made on May 31. Unscintillating ( talk) 13:05, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- History merge to Bulma, restoring the article Also, a history merge for the talk page. This is not a stale draft, and the attribution problem is fixed with a history merge. The discussion here shows that editors saw the redirect as a deletion, which of course does not justify plagiarism or a content fork, but may in part explain the incubation. As for notability, the editor claiming that the topic lacked notability at Talk:Bulma doesn't report what was found when looking at the 17 interwiki links. I've added three references to the article that show that a simple Google web search and Google book search would have found additional references. There is also preliminary agreement from the editors in the incubator as shown on the talk page of the incubated article that this article should be restored in main space. Unscintillating ( talk) 13:05, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- do not delete Whether this should be restored to mainspace and merged, or restored as a separate article, would be better discussed either on the article talk p. of AfD. This is not a good place for notability or article content decisions. DGG ( talk ) 23:55, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.