- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Blanked while Wikipedia awaits the return of Phoenix79. Brustopher ( talk) 22:59, 23 July 2015 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
User:Phoenix79/sandbox
Outdated work page. Binksternet ( talk) 00:52, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- The user has not been active for three years—why not just blank the sandbox? It's not suitable for an article, but it's not inappropriate to the level of needing a delete. Johnuniq ( talk) 00:58, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Just blank. Deleting others workspace without good reason is wasteful of resources. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 23:04, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. And here are the good reasons for deletion: WP:STALEDRAFT and WP:WEBHOST. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- WP:STALEDRAFT is not per se a reason for deletion in userspace. WP:WEBHOST here would be entirely satisfied by blanking, and while yes this page is not acceptable, the bringing of every such page to MfD is not a positive contribution. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 03:35, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- Blank There are thousands of stale user sandboxes of inactives users. There's no point in deleting them. Blanking is enough. 103.6.158.193 ( talk) 10:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.