- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Delete. -- RL0919 ( talk) 17:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
A WP:SPAMHOLE, despite being created with good intention in 2005. Wikipedia is not an internet directory. No discussion is taking place on this page and nothing of any significance links there. MER-C 08:27, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per the spirit of wp:ELNO. Nothing can beat this. I didn't even know the subpage existed. - DVdm ( talk) 08:49, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- I see this is already noindexed, but the rationale for getting rid entirely is cromulent.
Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (
talk)
10:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- As a three-year college student, I would say that I feel ashamed for not knowing what the word "cromulent" means, but
Merriam-Webster seems to share my ignorance. What is the contextual definition in this case?--
WaltCip (
talk)
15:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- It's slang for fine, acceptable — see
dictionary.reference.com. - I had to look it up too. Nice, cromulent word. -
DVdm (
talk)
15:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- While we no longer have a separate article for it, the redirect provides some detail into the history of this most wholesome of words. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 03:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
- It's slang for fine, acceptable — see
dictionary.reference.com. - I had to look it up too. Nice, cromulent word. -
DVdm (
talk)
15:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- As a three-year college student, I would say that I feel ashamed for not knowing what the word "cromulent" means, but
Merriam-Webster seems to share my ignorance. What is the contextual definition in this case?--
WaltCip (
talk)
15:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per the guidelines on External Links - this would never be acceptable as part of an article. Robofish ( talk) 17:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.