The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete as not having sufficient material for it to draw upon. Excluding redirects and project pages, there are only 32 pages within the relevant scope. Brambleclawx22:14, 23 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep - I think the issue is not the whole portal, but some of the info for the portal. (pictures, news, projects) Said info exists in very scant amounts for this topic. This is a large series of novels, and if we can do
this, The Percy Jackson series deserves a portal as well.
MMS201312:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)reply
We don't have nearly as much info on this series. I would say it's about a third or half the size of HP, and I'm concerned that we will run out of information.
Category:Percy Jackson and the Olympians has significantly less articles than
Category:Harry Potter. Every Percy Jackson and the Olympians file I have come across is subject to free use policies and would not suit the "featured picture" section of the portal. —
Airplaneman—
02:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)reply
Userify - I agree with those who doubt there will ever be enough information to justify a whole Portal, but let's keep it for now as a draft and see if it can go anywhere. --
SJK (
talk)
09:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)reply
I don't want it! If the project would like to keep it (which they don't seem to want to do), we could move it there.--
mono00:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.