The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Some of this content, when it is ready, will be suitable for merging with
Kenridge, Bellville. The latter article, accepted at AFC recently, was created by the same editor as this draft. I am willing to selectively merge it, if that is helpful.
Thincat (
talk)
07:03, 11 June 2018 (UTC)reply
You seem to be the sole author, so you may request deletion. I recommend keeping the redirect to keep your edit history available instead of hidden. —
SmokeyJoe (
talk)
12:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Note Why are people second-guessing the page author's request for deletion? It's a straightforward
WP:G7 situation, and this is a highly unusual reaction to something that should be a simple & routine Admin action. Author requests deletion --> Tag with G7 speedy ---> Page deleted. Why hasn't this happened?
Exemplo347 (
talk)
15:06, 11 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Any G7 ought to be declined because deletion would be controversial. We do not always accede to article creators' requests, even if they are the sole editor.
Thincat (
talk)
19:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC)reply
This entire discussion is an unnecessary exercise in bureaucracy. The sole author requested deletion. For some unexplained reason
Gbawden opened this discussion instead of doing what they were supposed to do - tag the draft with a g7 speedy. Gbawden, why didn't you follow the usual practice?
Exemplo347 (
talk)
19:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.