The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Tendentiously resubmitted native advertising for a non-notable company. Declined as an advert, then again as non-notable. When
DGG rejected it in April, he also
warned the submitter against trying to use Wikipedia for advertising. To a subsequent question at the AfC Help Desk, I
reiterated the problems with notability and sourcing. Nevertheless, the author has resubmitted it with the same passing mentions and non-independent sources. My own searches of the usual Google types turned up nothing longer than two sentences in independent reliable sources.
Worldbruce (
talk)
00:24, 23 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete, and considering the utter unlikelihood of an article on the company which makes a bench for car repair shops, possibly salt both the draft andthe potential article. (I do not know if we have ever done that, or perhaps we should wait until yet another try) DGG (
talk )
00:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - This wouldn't need deleting if the author had left it alone after the rejection, but the author is continuing to edit, which prevents
G13.
Salt with Extended-Confirmed so that a neutral editor can work if appropriate.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
01:04, 23 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.