The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:26, 4 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Draft:Bravo Storm

Draft:Bravo Storm ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not likely to be notable now or in the immediate future. A single RS using the VG/S reliable source search at [1] unveils a less-than GNG-worthy appearance. Given that it's a 2 year-old Facebook game, it's unlikely ever to be notable. Izno ( talk) 23:31, 25 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep. A lack of notability is irrelevant for drafts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiCreativeJuicer ( talk • contribs) 09:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  I don't agree. If the article has no potential ever to leave the draft status, there's no reason to keep it around (and subsequently we meet WP:NOTWEBHOST). "server space is a problem" is an unrealistic threshold to delete something. You appear to be a SPA in this regard, given that you appear to be a new account. -- Izno ( talk) 11:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  WikiCreativeJuicer has been blocked as a sockpuppet. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 20:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete; even if this game were to become notable at some future date, an article would have to be written from scratch based on what reliable third-party sources report. There's no purpose to keeping this draft around. Huon ( talk) 19:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.