The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The terms ("you use the material for non-commercial and non-political purposes only") of the website this was taken from are incompatible with the GFDL, which the image has been tagged as.
Picaroon(t)03:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)reply
You should hold off on deleting it. It was part of a large batch upload I did, and I've been adding the images to articles in an order in which this one will be encorporated later.
deBivort03:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)reply
The image description page contains no information on what it depicts, and it may have been uploaded for (but never actually used in) the deleted article
Dj Valium also created by the uploader. -
Mike Rosoft (
talk)
18:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Even if it were permanently located in a public place, American copyright law only grants the freedom of panorama for buildings. On the other hand, do you think we could claim fair use for the image? Does any of the articles where the image is used make non-trivial mention of the artwork? -
Mike Rosoft (
talk)
18:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Now I am not sure about the proper interpretation of the
fair use policy. I don't believe that the article sufficiently discusses his roles to warrant inclusion of his screenshot, but I'll welcome other users' opinions. -
Mike Rosoft (
talk)
12:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Why can't you,
Rhobite, help in in correcting it instead of condemning the image for deletion. That is the problem in Wikipedia. Editors only lable what is to be deleted instead of taking time to correct. Furthermore, it seems like you are the only one who has any objections to the image...humm. --
Hpfan1 (
talk)
18:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.