The result of the debate was:
solved by consensus, image speedied by Athaenara at uploader's request. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Done I agree! Fixed. The Bald One White cat 17:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was:
- Delete - per the below, Image:DonChipp-1977.jpg seems an adequate free alternate - Peripitus (Talk) 12:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was:
- Delete - It is possible that the image is copyright and the consensus tends towards that view. Also the image is of very poor quality and really serves to illustrate nothing apart from a vague shape - Peripitus (Talk) 11:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was:
- Delete - my reading of the debate is that the image clearly fails NFCC#1 and 8 - the image is replaceable by a free version and does not add significantly to the readers understanding - Peripitus (Talk) 04:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC) reply
As for the screenshot from Paris Hilton Responds to McCain Ad: An ad for The Paris Hilton Presidential Campaign: which image, from this filmed artistic creation of political satire, would best enhance readers' understanding, per NFCC #8? Would it be the selected image that specifically depicts Hilton as a candidate's talking head? Or another shot of Hilton that happens to be outdoors, in a bathingsuit, talking? In the spoof ad, Hilton is not wearing fancy makeup nor fashion-shoot get-up or evening "clubbing" wear, nor does she have fancily coifed hair, rather she has her hair pulled into pigtails with her shoulders bare with the sole exception of a swimsuit strap across the back of her neck, and behind her back can be seen the slats of her chaise lounge and then farther in the background, neatly trimmed shrubbery. This image is simply not replaceable since were Wikipedia to use an image of Hilton out clubbing or doing a fashion shoot this simply would fail to lend encyclopedic coverage to the viral video and if Wikipedia were to use a sketch drawn of Hilton fashioned after the screenshot this still would be copying the original. Justmeherenow ( ) 03:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was:
- Delete - While it is correct that Wikipedia:NFC#Images notes that cover art may be acceptable, that is a guideline. The image fails NFCC#8 (significance for reader's understanding) and it can be argued NFCC#3a as Image:Quidam illustration.jpg in the same article is basically the same image, that the image is on a CD cover does not seem significant - Peripitus (Talk) 12:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC) reply