Can't see a reason as to why the image would be of encyclopedic use, its orphaned and serves only to link through to a website —
Jamamala15:41, 6 June 2007 (UTC).reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Can this image be deleted right away? It was uploaded one day after the same image was deleted, see
log. It was deleted because fair use portraits of living people are considered to be replaceable. —
Ilse@16:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unfortunately this is not the work of a USGS employee as tagged. The image is watermarked with a copyright statement and
[1] states unequivocally, "All images contained hereafter are the property of the said photographer." howcheng {
chat}19:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.