My version is the original colour, (not Brightened as per the other example) and is a larger resolution. It should be kept and replace the other version of the file.
Fosnez04:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep: It appears to be the high-resolution uncropped image available upon request from NASA.
[1] Fosnez, I wonder if you have considered uploading the high-resolution version to Commons?
[2] --
Walter Siegmund(talk)03:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)reply
It is a photo released by NASA under their licence, I am no expert in copyright, but if it can be uploaded then please do so.
Fosnez05:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)reply
The Commons version might be a higher resolution, but its actually significantly lower quality. Note for example the lack of detail above the eyebrow. --
Solipsist08:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Uploaded by
Dalobuca (notify |
contribs). Being sent an image in spam does not allow you to release it into the Public Domain, as has been asserted by the uploader as the image's origin. This is a copyrighted image with no fair-use rationale given. --
Seidenstud17:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply
This picture is the official campaign picture for Correa and it is on the ballots used for the election. It is fair to consider it public domain. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
200.63.224.57 (
talk •
contribs)
How is it fair to consider someone's work public domain just because it is distributed? I could see fair-use, but no rationale has been given, and wouldn't that imply that there are no free alternatives available? But do we actually have any reason to beleive that there aren't any?? -
Seidenstud19:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Sorry, should have done this while logged in - the above submit was mine. This image is listed on the image page as copyright-free because it it a work of the Federal government, but it is actually the work of a county schoolboard, and as such is not copyright-free. The uploader has also had other problems with improperly using image that were then later removed (see edit history on
Syracuse, Utah). Also the image really adds no real value to the
Davis School District article, and so I commented it out so it's not currently visable. --
FishUtah19:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)reply