From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Uploaded by
ChrisFrez (
notify |
contribs ). Orphaned and watermarked. —
Roguegeek (
talk )
00:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Keep - Image makes sense.
Tonytypoon
05:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
FYI, Wikipedia is not a collection of files ... if an image is orphaned and there is no compelling reason to keep it, we generally get rid of it or ship it off to Commons. In this case, the image has a watermark on it. Watermarked user-created images tend to be frowned on.
BigDT
06:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete - How this image got even a single "keep" vote is simply beyond me. I didn't put the image up for deletion for no reason what so ever. Not only is the watermark frowned upon, but the
official policy clearly states "...user-created images may not be watermarked, distorted, have any credits in the image itself..." and that "all photo credit should be in a summary on the image description page." The image is a pretty clear violation of this policy.
Roguegeek (
talk )
07:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete - watermarked, and the low number of contributions from the uploader does not inspire confidence that the licensing is reliable (I know, assume good faith and all that, but still...)
CLW
09:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete for watermark if it is user-created (although I agree the licensing could be suspect).
Trebor
17:32, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Delete It shouldn't have a url as a watermark, or anything else for that matter. |
A ndonic O
Talk |
Sign Here
18:22, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Alandunlop1980 (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, sole remaining contribution of user, non-notable bio article about image subject deleted
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
00:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Cbraescu1 (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, sole contributuion of uploader
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
00:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Muratore (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned image, absent uploader since date of upload, insufficent inforamtion to determine encylopedic use
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
00:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Dnouwen (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, absent uploader, was likely used on deleted article about same subject, questionable license - should be logo
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
00:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Manda0788 (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned, absent uploader, simmilar named image already deleted, insufficent information to determine encylopedic use
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
00:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Flamefls (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, sole contribution of user, insufficent information to determine encylopedic use
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
00:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Vicmalloy (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned document, it contains a 13 page story which is copyrighted 1946 per first page, absent uploader
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
00:30, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Moriturus (
notify |
contribs ). Highly likely to be a copyright violation, although I couldn't find the original through Google image search. It is a professional quality headshot of a successful film and TV actress that I dobut was taken by the uploader and even if it was is very unlikely to be released into the public domain. —
Gwernol
01:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete it. The original can be found on
The CW 's website.
Speedy delete per
WP:CSD#G4 - It's a
reupload of previously deleted image. --
Abu Badali
01:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by [[User talk:#Image:Spcchurch.png listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] |
contribs ). obsolete — Saint Paul Community Church 01:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC). If the image has been replaced by another image, also list that image in your reasons, in the format " Spcchurch.png - obsoleted by Saint Paul Community Church.png". User=Spcc
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by [[User talk:#Image:SaintPaulCommunityChurch.png listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] |
contribs ). obsolete — Saint Paul Community Church 01:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC). If the image has been replaced by another image, also list that image in your reasons, in the format " SaintPaulCommunityChurch.png - obsoleted by Saint Paul Community Church.png". User=Spcc — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Spcc (
talk •
contribs )
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Mdvogt (
notify |
contribs ). OR, tagged as PD-self, but has a watermark "iPIX"
BigDT
02:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
BoBisChriS (
notify |
contribs ). OR, obviously a logo of some sort
BigDT
02:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
BoBisChriS (
notify |
contribs ). OR, obviously a logo of some sort
BigDT
02:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
BoBisChriS (
notify |
contribs ). OR, obviously a logo of some sort
BigDT
02:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
BoBisChriS (
notify |
contribs ). (Not an orphan) used on a user's page, but one frame of this animated gif uses GMail's logo and thus it is non-free
BigDT
02:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
TomAmerica (
notify |
contribs ). OR, unsufficient context to determine encyclopedic use, but it looks like it might be a publicity shot and non-free
BigDT
02:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Jgmz (
notify |
contribs ). OR, obviously a screenshot of something and includes non-free Adobe Acrobat logos
BigDT
02:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Lebaneseboy (
notify |
contribs ). OR, vanity pic and uploader's only contribution
BigDT
02:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Bnishu (
notify |
contribs ). OR, vanity pic and the uploader's only contribution
BigDT
02:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Ajlipp (
notify |
contribs ). OR, UE
BigDT
02:55, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Informacionmexico (
notify |
contribs ). OR, presumably a vanity pic and user's only contribution
BigDT
02:55, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per Tony.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Loki deathangel (
notify |
contribs ). OR, possibly someone's logo?
BigDT
02:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Shanthp (
notify |
contribs ). OR, UE "I made this file to show what true surliness looks like."
BigDT
03:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Raftacon (
notify |
contribs ). UE, used in an article deleted in
AFD and speedied several times as either A7 or G4.
Core
desat
08:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Speedy Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Tabletop (
notify |
contribs ). OB & LQ. This image has been replaced by
Image:Single side platform diagram.svg which is of much better quality and is in the SVG file format, whereas this one is of JPG. —
Harryboyles
12:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Tabletop (
notify |
contribs ). Similar to above, OB & LQ. This image has been replaced by
Image:Side platforms on double line diagram.svg which is of much better quality and is in the SVG file format, whereas this one is of JPG.
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Carlosbh (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned image, recently absent uploader, no information provided about what the different colours mean, also the source provided is the image itself
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
13:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Debivort (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, very low quality
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
13:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
go ahead and nuke it - the real version has underscores instead of dashes and is used in numerous pages. As for "low quality" - it's in an icon - it's meant to be small.
Debivort
06:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per uploader.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Bowz0317 (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, out of focus, unencylopedic use
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
13:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Teiler Köregäten (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, was uploaded for use in a deleted non-notable bio
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
13:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Camaro81 (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, slightly out of focus
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
13:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Whereuwant2b (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, editor absent since upload, question licensing given the source is a commercial site for the subject
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
13:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
SlickDevil15 (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned image, absent uploader, questionable license-
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
13:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete non-notable.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
SlickDevil15 (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned image, absent uploader, no source provided but likely same yearbook as above image
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
13:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete NN.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Ryld (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, sole contribution of uploader
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
13:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
BrendelSignature (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use, possiblity original research
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
13:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete NN.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Jhun80 (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned image, insufficent information provided to determine a future encylopedic use - no source/description and generic file name
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
14:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Tabletop (
notify |
contribs ). Similar to above, OB & LQ. This image has been replaced by
Image:Single side platform diagram.svg which is of much better quality and is in the SVG file format, whereas this one is of JPG. —
Harryboyles
14:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Habibpc (
notify |
contribs ). OR, AB, UE?, text on image page make it look like nonsense
MECU ≈
talk
15:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
That and it also looks like a copyvio. --
M (
speak /
spoken )
23:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete CV.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Dorothymiguel23 (
notify |
contribs ). OR, UE, AB, only contrib by user
MECU ≈
talk
15:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete NN.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Mekick (
notify |
contribs ). OR, AB, UE, few contribs by user
MECU ≈
talk
15:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Transwiki to Commons.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Pdgbailey (
notify |
contribs ). OR, AB, UE, used in deleted article, over 1 year old
MECU ≈
talk
15:49, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete NN.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Bladeroom (
notify |
contribs ). OR, UE, AB
MECU ≈
talk
16:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete vanity.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Fcmisc (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned image, editor absent since upload, insufficent information to determine encylopedic use, appears to be personal photo
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
17:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete Not blog.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Adrievdl (
notify |
contribs ). This image is currently an orphan, the user was long absent and then uploaded this image and has been absent again since. I am unable to determine an encyclopedic place for this photo.
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
17:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Transwiki to Commons.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Julian01 (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned document, sole contribution of editor, this theory is original research
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
17:32, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete Obviously original research.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Angeles624 (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned image, very low quality, editor recently absent
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
17:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete LQ.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
And1ms238 (
notify |
contribs ). Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk )
19:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
And1ms238 (
notify |
contribs ). Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk )
19:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
And1ms238 (
notify |
contribs ). Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk )
19:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
And1ms238 (
notify |
contribs ). Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk )
19:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
And1ms238 (
notify |
contribs ). Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk )
19:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
And1ms238 (
notify |
contribs ). Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk )
19:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete LQ.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
And1ms238 (
notify |
contribs ). Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk )
19:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
And1ms238 (
notify |
contribs ). Orphan, unencyclopedic, questionable claim of authorship. —
Bkell (
talk )
19:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
And1ms238 (
notify |
contribs ). Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk )
19:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete per nom.
Xiner (
talk ,
email )
16:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Tajbraunch (
notify |
contribs ). Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk )
20:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Tajbraunch (
notify |
contribs ). Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk )
20:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Tajbraunch (
notify |
contribs ). Orphan, unencyclopedic. —
Bkell (
talk )
20:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
FullMetal Falcon (
notify |
contribs ). Will be replaced with free image. Obsoleted by
Image:Opera DS mockup.jpg —
FullMetal Falcon
21:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Keep until an image of reasonable quality is found or "created". If this image is under copyright, then it's fair use. The current rubbish alternative is awful and should not be used. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
82.10.210.113 (
talk •
contribs ) 16:23, 30 December 2006
Delete. 82.10.210.113:
The criteria require that "No free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information."
Let's break that up. First: "No free equivalent is available or could be created " (my emphasis). A free equivalent could easily be created by a Wikimedia photographer who lives in or visits the United Kingdom or Ireland, the only countries where the browser has been distributed to the English-speaking public. However, no such photographer has yet shown interest, so I made the
Free (CC-BY/GFDL) image in question as the best possible replacement outside the British Isles. In addition, {{
promotional }} states that it should be used on images that are "unrepeatable, i.e. a free image could not be created to replace it" (my emphasis), not merely "unrepeated, i.e. a free image has not already been created to replace it". Per policy, a Free image is better than a higher quality proprietary image. By at least one interpretation of policy, even the possibility of making a Free image
trumps the highest quality proprietary image.
Second: "that would adequately give the same information." Though I (the photographer) admit that the Free image's photographic quality leaves something to be desired, it does "adequately give the same information" that the browser software fits in the DS slot and a memory expansion pak fits in the GBA slot, just as the promotional photo does. --
Damian Yerrick (
☎ )
02:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Plus the image can be photo shopped like the Wii.
FullMetal Falcon
20:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Brodie319 (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, absent uploader, personal photo with no encylopedic use
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
21:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Alan.lazarus (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, absent uploader, unencylopedic street shot
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
21:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
RadicalBender (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, uploader has indicated he has left, no encylopedic use
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
21:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
I reckon this is a good candidate for
Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense . Had a chuckle when I saw this.
Harryboyles
02:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Grassvalleygreg (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, absent uploader, unencylopedic personal photo
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
22:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Jen106 (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned image, appears image was used in deleted article about subject, absent uploader
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
22:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Norjag (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned image, lower quality, unencylopedic use, absent uploader
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
22:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Norjag (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned image, lower quality, unencylopedic use, absent uploader
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
22:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Prettyfishie (
notify |
contribs ). orpahned, absent uploader, questionable claim of ownership
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
22:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Zz2133 (
notify |
contribs ). orphaned image, absent uploader, unencylopedic - also the name is horific
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
22:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Britland15 (
notify |
contribs ). OR, UE, AB, "not accurate"
MECU ≈
talk
22:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Mattderojas (
notify |
contribs ). OB by
TV Ark frontpage.PNG . Self-tagged by uploader. --
M (
speak /
spoken )
23:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Uploaded by
Iamvered (
notify |
contribs ). "Not used in any articles, only userspace." –
Twas Now
00:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Keep - this image is a free image. It is allowable for these types of images to be used in templates and on user pages. This user has been around for more then a year and is a regular contributor. No reason to delete.--
Gay Cdn
(talk)
(Contr.)
02:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Keep - Keep as above.
.V.
02:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Keep - As the subject and generator of the photo in question, I am, in some measure, offended that I should have to justify my existence. Have we nothing better to do than delete photos of users? Here's a suggestion: write an article and contribute something to the world's knowledge base, and stop policing user photos. It's a tiny little picture of my face. What's it hurting? I'm going off to sulk now. Happy new year to you all.
Iamvered
16:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC) (by the way, for the humor-impaired, that's sarcasm)
reply
Uploaded by
Majik43 (
notify |
contribs ). Given uploader's history with providing licensing and source information, I very much doubt that this tag is accurate. —
The JP S
talk to me
00:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC) .
reply