This is an
essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This page in a nutshell: Dates (individual days of a given month of a four digit year, and four digit years) may be formatted in the same way as they would under ISO 8601, but Wikipedia does not claim that they follow ISO 8601 |
ISO 8601 is an international standard for communicating certain information, in particular between computer systems. The information comprises certain units of time which would normally be called "dates and times" from millennia (and with extensions larger units) down to seconds and decimal fractions thereof (for example 12:34 on 10 April 1962), and other time-like entities which we need not concern ourselves with here.
For purposes of style the English Wikipedia permits a number of representations of dates which are, or are partially, consistent with the representations of ISO 8601 - however these are not to be considered ISO 8601 dates, although by happy accident they may be consistent in other respects, there is no guarantee, or even attempt to make sure they are.
Constant in style and meaning.
Consistent in style but not valid in substance - ISO dates cannot be used before 1582 without agreement between "the exchanging parties" - and also need to be in the Gregorian calendar, proleptic if necessary.
Not even consistent with style ISO would have "0986" - 986 would represent the decade 9860-9869.
ISO would have "-0004".
While, clearly, there is nothing to stop quotation of any date, whether ISO valid, ISO style and invalid, or just plain wrong - in non-quoted text - only the YYYY (without leading 0s) and YYYY-MM-DD formats are explicitly permitted by the MoS. For example, 1999-10 for October 1999 is not cromulent with the MoS, and indeed use of numbers to represent months, other than in YYYY-MM-DD is frowned upon. Similarly unexplained use of the finer grained entities than days (hour, minutes, seconds), use of "2" for the third millennium (-1 year) or 198 for the 1980s, or of the recurring periods would be considered obscure at best, and just wrong at worst. We do not use a solidus to represent periods, nor do we use ISO style formats for weeks of the year or days of the year.
"ISO 8601 does not specify the exact meaning of its representations." [1]