The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Result: Honestly even with just the one delist vote, it feels like nobody is interested in working on this, and the sheer workload to make it a proper GA isn't going to be done with just one person. Multiple nudges to have work done on the article resulted in nothing. Delisting this article.Kung Fu Man (
talk)
01:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Article overrelies mostly on lists, and some of the cited sources do not entirely say what they are cited for. It also contains Refbomb, and some of the claim were unsourced. It needs a heavy clean up to fulfill GA criteria.
GlatorNator (
ᴛ)
12:43, 8 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Delist Reception is really weak for such a massive cultural icon. You'd think it was just another random non-notable Pokemon. The article needs a cleanup and rewrite before it can start to meet GA standards. Less random listicles and clickbait articles saying "Fuck Pikachu" and more book sources denoting Pikachu's cultural impact. Page 38 of Pikachu's Global Adventure: The Rise and Fall of Pokemon has a whole section analyzing Pikachu's character design, but is not even cited in the article besides further reading. And so on and so forth.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
08:06, 9 June 2023 (UTC)reply
I am already aware that this is entirely my fault. I don't think this reply makes me "snippy", since I already went in his talkpage.
GlatorNator (
ᴛ)
04:06, 16 June 2023 (UTC)reply
We all make mistakes, but some mistakes are more annoying than others, especially when the editor has seemingly shown more interest in delisting articles than keeping them {see their talk). Removed the highlighting.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk)
11:42, 16 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Bold of you to say that. I've cleaned up multiple GA articles, thou some of them needed to be rewritten or expanded to meet its GA criteria, thats why I ended up nominating them for GAR like Kefka or this one. I admit im new at GAR thing.
GlatorNator (
ᴛ)
11:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.