I just started reading this article and noticed there is a refimprove tag that has been unchallenged for several months, and numerous {{
cn}} tags throughout the article against unsourced content. That would probably be a quickfail if I GA reviewed it today. I'm not sure how to fix it all - can anyone else help?
Ritchie333(talk)(cont)13:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delist. While
Zwerg Nase took care of some of the citations, there are still eleven tags in the article, many of them for completely uncited paragraphs. The final statement of the lead is one of them, and it's talking about something that ought to be in the article itself, a problem given
WP:LEAD. This is potentially fixable, but even with those initial edits two and a half weeks ago, the verifiability is still a significant problem.
BlueMoonset (
talk)
03:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delist: unfortunately it doesn't appear like the referencing meets GA standards and while some efforts have been made, these do not appear to have fully addressed this issue. Regards,
AustralianRupert (
talk)
00:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)reply