The result of the discussion was: No action. Please don't upload this to Commons folks - FASTILY 23:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
File has since been replaced by a free alternative on its article Sky Q. This being an old logo is also no longer used at the top inside the infobox for primary identification, i.e. no longer compliant with non-free content criteria. Jf81 ( talk) 09:53, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Fan-made logo, no educational value. — Alexis Jazz ( talk or ping me) 19:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Bogus PD reason. No evidence that the logo was made or first published in 1930. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Previously published in http://memory.loc.gov/master/afc/afc2001001/68664/pd0001.pdf. Despite extensive photo credits, the photo of the museum doesn't seem covered by the credits so the origins are unknown. — Alexis Jazz ( talk or ping me) 21:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Reading es:Wikipedia:Autorización para insertar material de PROMPERU con Copyright, I get the feeling that this only covers use by Wikipedia and/or on the web. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
This Wikipedia screenshot includes File:The Man from U.N.C.L.E.jpg, which is listed as unfree. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete - FASTILY 23:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Both were previously nominated individually but then were kept by default, the result of "no consensus". To this date, the samples are still used at Loose (Nelly Furtado album). They should've been removed from that article when the previous FFD discussion was closed (and another). Indeed, there was no support to keep the samples in the album article. Rather there was one support to keep/use them in their respective song articles, Promiscuous (song) and Maneater (Nelly Furtado song). The samples in the individual song articles may or may not meet WP:NFCC#8. However, I'm defaulting to decide that the samples may still fail the criterion in any way, so I'm hoping that a vote can give a rebuttal. Furthermore, telling from the previous individual FFD discussions, the samples may still fail WP:NFCC#8 at the Loose album article... unless fresher votes can prove me wrong. George Ho ( talk) 23:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC); expanded, 23:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Currently used in three articles: No Doubt, Rock Steady (album) (Featured Article), and Underneath It All (Good Article). I'm not confident that the sample meets WP:NFCC#8 in the band article and the album article. I'm also not confident that removing the sample would affect how readers learn about the band and the album. The sample may or may not the criterion in the song article. Let's then remove the sample from either two or all articles. George Ho ( talk) 23:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Remove from Rock Steady (album) - FASTILY 23:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Currently used in Rock Steady (album) and Hey Baby (No Doubt song), both Featured Articles. Uncertain whether the sample meets WP:NFCC#8 when used in the song article. At least it's used in the "Composition" section rather than the introduction. However, I doubt that the sample meets the criterion when used in the album article, and I believe that the album can be already understood without any samples while reading the article. Of course, someone may disagree. George Ho ( talk) 23:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Remove from Punk rock - FASTILY 23:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Previously nominated; the result was "no consensus", leading to keeping the sample in both " All the Small Things" and " Punk rock" articles to this date. Actually, there were split votes to keep the sample in or remove it from the genre article. Well, the "keep" vote IMO didn't have much depth other than merely keeping it in both articles.
I thought the result should have been "kept in the song but removed from the genre". I still think there is one too many samples in the genre article (violating WP:NFCC#3a), which is soon to be (telling from votes at the FARC page) demoted/delisted from being Featured Article any longer. I believe that the sample may also fail WP:NFCC#8 (different criterion indeed) at the genre article. Recently, at the song article, I moved the sample down from the intro to the "Background" section for further context. Whether the sample meets WP:NFCC at the song article is still up for discussion. Maybe it does. George Ho ( talk) 23:58, 11 October 2021 (UTC); edited, 00:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)