The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:ARP-Humaitá.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 00:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:SATeaGarden03.JPG Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 02:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:PabloAngelesDavid.jpg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 02:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Signature of unknown individual Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 03:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
This has been uploaded with no camera details, suggesting it to be a scan of a picture from either wet film or another source, but no declaration of source has been made.
This diff suggests it to be a public domain picture. Unless the uploader is the photographer this is unlikely to be the case. The subject of the picture died in 2014 and it is mathematically impossible that the photographer has been dead for the requisite number of years for it to be out of copyright. It is likely to be a copyright violation (0.9 probability) Fiddle Faddle 12:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 October 5. Izno ( talk) 14:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Textbook violation of being a derivative of non-free content. Also noting that the file has been deleted for the same reason on Commons - FASTILY 00:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
This is a derivative work of a poem. Copyright doesn't belong to the uploader, but to the poet and the page artist. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 15:25, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Su-10.jpg. It doesn't appear the original license was ever valid. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 15:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relicensed to non-free - FASTILY 00:10, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Diocese of Tarlac Seal.svg. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 15:41, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Failed license review: all rights reserved: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mcyavell/7637656512/ Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 15:46, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted derivative work (flag design and mistletoe). Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 15:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work, erected in 1995. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 15:49, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The species is not extinct yet. Fails "Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information" Jonatan Svensson Glad ( talk) 20:55, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Unknown extent of possible use. Jonteemil ( talk) 21:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
No evidence this is a work of the US federal government. The original photo was donated by the Howard Hughes Corporation to the University of Nevada, which has not evaluated its copyright status. The photo was taken in 1943 and the date of first publication is unclear. Wikiacc ( ¶) 21:37, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Unknown extent of possible use. Jonteemil ( talk) 21:37, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Removed from Vince Guaraldi - FASTILY 00:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
which is not the case at all and makes it seem as if the rational for the album's article was simply copied and pasted with only theMain infobox. The image is used for identification in the context of critical commentary of the work for which it serves as cover art. It makes a significant contribution to the user's understanding of the article, which could not practically be conveyed by words alone. The image is placed in the infobox at the top of the article discussing the work, to show the primary visual image associated with the work, and to help the user quickly identify the work and know they have found what they are looking for. Use for this purpose does not compete with the purposes of the original artwork, namely the artist's providing graphic design services to music concerns and in turn marketing music to the public.
|article=
parameter really being changed in an attempt to meet
WP:NFCC#10c.The file as removed from the artist's article
here and
here. After it was removed the first time, it was re-added by an IP account
here without any attempt made to address the
WP:NFCC reasons why it was removed. After the second time it was removed, it was re-added
here and an attempt was made to at least address the NFCC#10c issuing by providing a rationale, but as explained above, in
WP:JUSTONE and in
WP:NFCCE, that rationale is not sufficient. A non-free use needs to have a valid rationale that satisfies all ten
WP:NFCCP. So, even though the a rationale was provided the second time, the file was still basically re-added
as before without any sourced critical commentary or content at all about the cover art which might be seen as meeting
WP:NFC#CS. This is a well-known album by a well-known artist and both album and artist have their own stand-alone Wikipedia articles; that, however, isn't in and of itself a sufficient justification for using the album cover in the artist's article and the long-standing consensus per WP:NFC#cite-note-3 is that this type of non-free use is not NFCCP compliant absent any significant discussion (i.e. sourced critical commentary) about the cover art itself in the artist's article. If such commentary can be found and added, then perhaps an argument for the file's non-free use could be made. Even then though, the use would be mainly decorative per item 6 of WP:NFC#UUI and not necessary per
WP:FREER since such content would better off in the article about the album than the artist; Guaraldi created the music for the album, but it seems highly unlikely that he actually designed the album cover art itself so the most that could probably be said was that he helped select it which isn't really enough of a justification for using a non-free file in the article about him. Suggest keep in the album’s article and remove from the artist’s article. --
Marchjuly (
talk)
21:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Test file that should've "safely been deleted after Feb. 2008." Jonteemil ( talk) 21:41, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Unused test file Jonteemil ( talk) 21:54, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of probably copyrighted material. Jonteemil ( talk) 21:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)