The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

File:Kalibak.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bignole ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails NFCC criteria 3a (minimal number of items) and criteria 8 (contextual significance). Not substantially different from the depiction in the infobox of the same article, File:Kalibak.png. Any visual differences aren't discussed in sourced prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 07:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

File:CousinKevinscreenshot1980.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kieronoldham ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails NFCC criteria 3a (minimal number of items) and criteria 8 (contextual significance). There are five photos of individual victims and one collage of 22 victims - all non-free images - in the article already. This particular victim is barely discussed, as compared to three of the five with images. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 09:01, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete the image, The Squirrel Conspiracy. Hand on heart I think now the article is being rapidly improved this image and the other one you tagged (which I did not upload) are now somewhat excess. Regards,-- Kieronoldham ( talk) 19:15, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Delete Too many non-free.- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:53, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

File:Godzik.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MisterCake ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails NFCC criteria 3a (minimal number of items) and criteria 8 (contextual significance). There are five photos of individual victims and one collage of 22 victims - all non-free images - in the article already. This particular victim is barely discussed, as compared to three of the five with images. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 09:01, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• DeleteProbably more non-free than necessary.- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 April 18. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

File:Body 10 and Body 13.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

File:Sinestro (circa 1969).png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NeoBatfreak ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails NFCC criteria 3a (minimal number of items) and criteria 8 (contextual significance). Not substantially different from the other two non-free images of the character in the article. Any visual differences aren't discussed in sourced prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 09:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

File:HellblazerCVR189.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Neodammerung ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails NFCC criteria 3a (minimal number of items) and criteria 8 (contextual significance). Not substantially different from the non-free depiction of the character in the article infobox. Any visual differences aren't discussed in sourced prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 09:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep on the Arrowverse page, remove from elsewhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:50, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

File:John Constantine (Matt Ryan).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CBRVA ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails NFCC criteria 1 (no free replacement available) and 8 (contextual significance). An image of the actor could be used in this section without any significant loss to readers' understanding, and there are already a number of non-free depictions of the character in the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 09:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Fine, then keeps the image on the article John Constantine (Arrowverse).-- NeoBatfreak ( talk) 01:37, 17 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

File:John Constantine (Keanu Reeves).jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Neodammerung ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails NFCC criteria 1 (no free replacement available) and 8 (contextual significance). An image of the actor could be used in this section without any significant loss to readers' understanding, and there are already a number of non-free depictions of the character in the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 09:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. —  JJMC89 ( T· C) 19:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

File:Dr Fate Mattel Figure.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mickdansforth ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails NFCC criteria 3a (minimal number of items) and criteria 8 (contextual significance). The toy is not significantly different from the non-free images of the character also present in the article, and is not the subject of cited critical discussion. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 09:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. —  JJMC89 ( T· C) 19:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC) reply

File:SAYUL in Kolkata.pdf ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SAYUL KOLKATA TEAM ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No encyclopediac value, just a massive self-publication about themselves by a group that is working to get themselves included on wikipedia. Didn't strictly fit any speedy criteria. DMacks ( talk) 17:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 03:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete, obviously out of scope. A a s i m 17:11, 12 April 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete, unused and created by a blocked promotional user. CrazyBoy826 ( talk) 18:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.